Answer:
"You should never drive where you cannot see"
Explanation:
According to my research on driving safety, I can say that based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the missing statement would be "You should never drive where you cannot see". There are many situations such as "you should never drive under the influence of alchohol or drugs" but since the rest of the statements indicate on road conditions I would say that the first one is the answer.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
racism
Explanation:
during the civil rights there was a lot of people that didn't like other races in America.
Answer:
popular culture
Explanation:
According to my research on studies conducted by various behaviorists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question Jamie's behavior is most likely influenced by popular culture. This is a culture based on the tastes of everyday regular people in a society. This culture includes, movies, tv, fashion, music, etc.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:Both Is the evidence sufficient to support the speaker's claims? and Is the evidence relevant to the speaker's claims?
Explanation:
Before one can make a claim there should be enough evidence to support that claim otherwise it could sound just like their own opinion or views on the matter that they are discussing .
Sufficient claim can or will give viewers or listeners the factual information about what one is claiming which may make persuasion more effective .
People are more likely to believe something and be convinced about it as long as there is sufficient evidence to support it and they can see how the evidence is linked or related to the claim .
Otherwise if the evidence doesn't relate to the claim then it can not be taken as an evidence for that particular claim and people can easily dismiss that claim.
Answer:
b. The defendant's conduct was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's emotional distress
Explanation:
The act must be intentional, offensive and it could not possibly be considered as a mistake or joke which led to emotional distress in the plaintiff. That is, the emotional distress experienced by the plaintiff must be linked to the conducts/actions of the defendant,
