Mark is listening to a speaker's evidence during a persuasive speech on nuclear power. According to your textbook, Mark should b
e asking: Is the evidence taken from objective sources? Is the evidence relevant to the speaker's claims? All of these answers are correct. Is the evidence sufficient to support the speaker's claims? Both Is the evidence sufficient to support the speaker's claims? and Is the evidence relevant to the speaker's claims?
Answer:Both Is the evidence sufficient to support the speaker's claims? and Is the evidence relevant to the speaker's claims?
Explanation:
Before one can make a claim there should be enough evidence to support that claim otherwise it could sound just like their own opinion or views on the matter that they are discussing .
Sufficient claim can or will give viewers or listeners the factual information about what one is claiming which may make persuasion more effective .
People are more likely to believe something and be convinced about it as long as there is sufficient evidence to support it and they can see how the evidence is linked or related to the claim .
Otherwise if the evidence doesn't relate to the claim then it can not be taken as an evidence for that particular claim and people can easily dismiss that claim.
Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that in this scenario the class seems to be in the production stage of problem solving. This stage focuses on producing a list of various actions that can be taken in order to solve a problem. Which seems to be exactly what the class in this scenario is doing.
<span>One reason why political parties do not take stronger policy positions on issues and enforce them is that PARTY MEMBERSHIP IS TOO MODERATE. Because the party membership is moderate, a lot of the members would leave if the political party began to make extremely strong policy changes.</span>
