All categories

3 years ago

For a company using target costing, market price minus profit equals target price.

Business

1 answer:

Sav [38]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

The answer is false

Explanation:

Market price minus profit equals target cost and not target price.

You might be interested in

Which of the following might not be an option for increasing your present income? (1 point)requesting a promotion requesting a m

Alenkasestr [34]

Answer – Quitting your job to find another
Quitting your job to find another might not be an option for increasing your present income. As a matter of fact, doing so lead to a reduction of income if a less-paying job is found after quitting the current one, or worse still total lack of income if no job is found after quitting the present job. In simple terms, if you quit your present job, there is no guarantee that you’ll find a better one. A more feasible option would be to start looking for a better job without quitting your old job. Better still, if the options are available, you may request a promotion at your present job or request a merit increase in pay.

7 0

3 years ago

Security Analysts that have evaluated Concordia Corporation, have determined that there is a 15% chance that the firm will gener

dexar [7]

Answer:

3.17

Explanation:

Expected earnings per share = (15%x2.40)+(60%x3.10)+(25%x3.80)

4 0

3 years ago

Salcia is a country that depends heavily on domestic products. The Salcian government decides on the products that can be import

hoa [83]

Answer:

D) Mercantilism

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that Salcia's approach to international trade is being influenced by Mercantilism. This term refers to a policy that was created in order to maximize exports of a nation while at the same time minimizing the imports. This is what Salcia is trying to accomplish by not importing anything that they can make at home.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.

6 0

3 years ago

You have an investment account that started with $3 comma 000 10 years ago and which now has grown to $6 comma 000. a. What an

zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

The correct answer for option (a) is 7.17% and for option (b) is $48,546.69.

Explanation:

According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:

(a) Present value = $3,000

Future value = $6,000

Time period = 10 years

So, we can calculate the annual rate of return by using following formula:

Rate of return = (( FV ÷ PV)^1/t -1)

= (( $6,000 ÷ $3,000)^1/10 -1)

= (2)^0.1 - 1

= 1.07177346254 - 1

= .07177 or 7.17%

(b) Present value = $12,000

Rate of interest (r) = 15%

Time period = 10 year

So, we can calculate the Future value by using following formula:

FV = PV × ( 1+r)^t

= $12,000 × ( 1 + 15%)^10

= $12,000 × 4.04555773571

= $48,546.69

8 0

3 years ago

Ricardo paid an annual premium of $1,200 in total liability coverage for his car, including up to $200,000 in bodily injury cove

Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

No, the cost of the annual premium for 10 years was less than the accident claims

Explanation:

Since in the question it is mentioned that the annual premium is $1,200, $200,000 is the bodily injury coverage and $100,000 should be the property damage coverage

Also the $40,000 and $20,000 represent the medical cost and the car damage

So here the cost should not outweight the benefit of the transferring the risk as the annual premium cost for ten years should be lower than the accident claims

3 0

3 years ago