All categories

3 years ago

Suppose that consumption depends on the interest rate. how if at all does this alter the conclusions

1 answer:

3 0

Here is the answer. Suppose that consumption depends on the interest rate, how this alters the conclusions is that at any given level of the interest rate, national saving falls by the change in government purchases. You should also consider what happens when government purchases increase. Hope this helps.

You might be interested in

Consider the following account balances (in thousands) for the Peterson Company.

stealth61 [152]

Answer:

Cost Of Goods Manufactured $ 133,000

Explanation:

Peterson Company

Schedule for the cost of goods manufactured

For 2017

Direct Materials (opening Inventory) 21,000

Add Purchases 74,000

Less Ending Inventory (23000)

Materials available for Use 72,000

Add Direct Labor 22,000

Factory Overhead

Indirect Manufacturing Labor 17,000

Plant Insurance 7,000

Depreciation 11,000

Repairs 3000 38,000

132,000

Add Opening WIP 26,000

Less Closing WIP 25,000

Cost Of Goods Manufactured $ 133,000

7 0

3 years ago

You work for a local convenience store. At the end of 2nd shift, 11PM, any foods in the heated kiosk are to be discarded. Money

Yuliya22 [10]

Well this is a good question I think its not

4 0

3 years ago

If csc θ = 2, Find sin θ

RoseWind [281]

If csc 0=2, then that makes 0 then equal 4.

5 0

3 years ago

Think about what happened to Standard Oil. Write a paragraph in which you explain whether or not you agree with the actions take

hoa [83]

The United States government was correct in interfering with the growth of Standard Oil. Not only was the company taking advantage of existing situations, but eventually it would have controlled the oil market entirely. If Standard Oil was able to gain control of the market for a long period of time, consumers could have had to pay extremely high prices for the oil that they needed, limiting their purchase of other goods. Or Sample response: The United States government should not have interfered with the growth of Standard Oil. Because the company had managed to reduce production costs, it was able to offer very low prices to consumers. This benefited many Americans. Without the company's production benefits, citizens were not able to take advantage of this infrastructure.

5 0

3 years ago

For seven years, Stanford Owens has run a successful practice that helps small businesses file their taxes, become incorporated,

Shalnov [3]

Answer:

The answer id: D) Yes, because Stanford and DiggyWerx each receive a benefit and incur a detriment.

Explanation:

Both Stanford and DiggyWerx both receive a benefit from this contract; Stanford gets $5,500 and DiggyWerx gets accounting services for six months.

They both also incurred detriment since; Stanford promised to perform his accounting duties and DiggyWerx promised to pay him money.

Both parties incurred detriment (promised to do something) and something of value is exchanged benefiting both parties, so consideration exists and therefore the control is enforceable.

6 0

3 years ago