<span> became president of kenya </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
In the case of Chiafalo v. Washington (2020), the Supreme Court ruled that it is constitutional for states to place restrictions on who electors can vote for.
I agree with this decision because voting in the Electoral College is a serious thing, and members of the college have to assume this important and serious role. That is why they are members of the Electoral College and expressed their intention to vote for the candidate they supported.
I think there would be no room for faithless electors in the US Electoral College. There is no reason for them to vote for other people if they originally pledge to vote for their candidates.
On July 6, 2020, the case of Chiafalo v. Washington was decided.
The Treaty of Friendship, Limits, and Navigation Between Spain and the United States, signed in San Lorenzo de El Escorial on October 27, 1795, was necessary because it would become in an important diplomatic success for the United States. It resolved territorial disputes between SPAIN and the USA; in addition, It gave American ships the possibility of free navigation on the southern portion of the Mississippi and the free passage through the port of New Orleans, then under Spanish control.
<span>Britain supported the North financially and militarily.
The woolen mills of the North exported wool to Britain.
Britain exported textiles to the North.
The North exported extra cotton to Britain.
The North exported wheat and corn to Britain.
</span>
<span>disciplined dictatorship lol idk</span>
