COMPLETE QUESTION:
A psycholinguist conducts an experiment with a group of participants from a small village in Asia and another from a small village in South America. She asked the groups to describe the bands of color they saw in a rainbow and found they reported the same number of bands as their language possessed primary color words. These results:
Group of answer choices
(a) support the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
(b) contradict the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis
(c) support the word frequency effect
(d) contradict the word frequency effect
ANSWER: SUPPORT THE SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS.
EXPLANATION:
SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS is also referred to as the “linguistic determinism hypothesis”.
The hypothesis stated that language and it's structure directly influence or limit the knowledge and thinking capacities of it speakers.
Thus, the experiments underwent by the psycholinguist support SAPIR-WHORF HYPOTHESIS, since the two group of participants described the same bands of color seen in the rainbow, because their language incorporate the primary color words.
Answer:
b. when restraining forces are removed, driving forces will produce change
Explanation:
Force field analysis is a theory of Kurt Lewin in his contribution to change management.
This model suggests how change agents may diagnose the forces that drive and restrain proposed organizational change. It draws from this that change agents can only cause change to happen if they eliminate forces restraining order resisting this change.
Lewin list four forces in his research: change forces, driving forces, restraining forces and resisting forces, suggesting that in order for a change to happen the driving forces have to be more than the restraining forces and an equilibrium means no change.
Answer:
large and cold are both adjectives.
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
Reasonableness standard is a designed to test if a solution is the best fit to the problem. in case of law, it designed to to ask whether the decision made is legitimate and can remedy a solution to a certain case.
The best option that explains my analogy above, is Option C, the strictest test by which a law may be evaluated.
The correct answer is random selection.
Random selection refers to a process in which a sample or group of participants for a research study are randomly drawn from the entire population the researcher has access to. The main strength of using a random sample for a research study is that biases are avoided and the findings obtained are more representative of the population as a whole.
