2(p+1)=16
2p+2=16
2p= 16-2
2p= 14
p= 14 ÷2
p= 7
2.6 rounds to 3, and 0.33 would round to 0.50. Adding 3 and 0.50 together would equal to 3.50. 59 and 3.50 are no where near to each other which concludes Minh is incorrect.
(Please mark me brainliest)
For x > 2, you would circle the 2, but you would not shade it in because it is greater than/ less than, not greater than or equal to/less than or equal to. From there on, you would move it to the right, because here x is greater than 2, and the numbers to the right of 2 are greater than two.
For x < 2, you would again circle the 2, but don't shade it in. And then you would make a line heading towards the left, because the numbers to the left of 2 are smaller than 2, and here, x is smaller than 2, since 2 is greater.
A value that is not the solution to either inequality is 2. 2 is not greater than 2, and 2 is not less than 2.
Calculate the risk measure (beta) compared to the returns of asset and market premium.
1.4 = 4 + 9((rm^-4)
1.4 = 9rm ^-32
33.4 = 9rm
Rm = 3.71
The answer is 3.71
