Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

11

A local store sells oranges at a price of six for nine dollars Abby wants to send 24 oranges to her grandmother how much would y

ou spend if she buys the oranges at the local store

1 answer:

amid [387]3 years ago

5 0

This would be the oranges are $1.50 each 9÷6=1.50

1.50*6=9

1.50*24=36

So she would be spending $36 dollars

Hope this helps!

You might be interested in

Which is closest to the diference in the volume of the two cylinders? A-4cm and 18cm. B-5cm and 5cm, A. 15,795 cm3 B. 2,534 cm3

Lunna [17]

Answer:

Difference in the volume = 512 cm³ (Approx)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Radius of cylinder A (r1) = 4 cm

Height of cylinder A (h1) = 18 cm

Radius of cylinder B (r2) = 5 cm

Height of cylinder B (h2) = 5 cm

Find:

Difference in the volume.

Computation:

Difference in the volume = Volume of cylinder A - Volume of cylinder B

$Difference\ in\ the\ volume = \pi (r1)^2(h1)- \pi (r2)^2(h2)\\\\Difference\ in\ the\ volume = \pi (4)^2(18)- \pi (5)^2(5)\\\\Difference\ in\ the\ volume = \pi (16)(18)- \pi (25)(5)\\\\Difference\ in\ the\ volume =905.3-392.5\\\\Difference\ in\ the\ volume = 512.8$

Difference in the volume = 512 cm³ (Approx)

6 0

3 years ago

Could you please help me with this question.

ale4655 [162]

The shape of the graph is very similar to a natural logarithm, which is ln(x). ln(x) has an asymptote at x=0. Shift the graph 3 units to the left and you have the graph of ln(x+3), which has an asymptote at x= -3. Also, when x=0, ln(x+3) is about 1. I think ln(x+3) is the answer. Check this online graph to see if this matches:
https://www.desmos.com/calculator/ac1axswddl

Have a nice day!

5 0

3 years ago

If f(x) = 4x + 21 and g(x) = 2x + 2 what is f[g(7)]

Nana76 [90]

Answer:

we conclude:

$f(g(7)) =85$

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

$f(x) = 4x + 21$

$g(x) = 2x + 2$

To determine

$f(g(7)) =?$

In order to determine f(g(7)), the first step we need to do is to determine g(7)

so substitute x = 7 in g(x) = 2x + 2

$g(x) = 2x + 2$

$g(7) = 2(7) + 2$

$g(7) = 14 + 2$

$g(7) = 16$

so now we have

$f(g(7)) =f(16)$

The next step to do is to substitute x = 16 in f(x) = 4x + 21

$f(x) = 4x + 21$

$f(16) = 4(16) + 21$

$f(16) = 64 + 21$

$f(16) = 85$

so we have

$f(g(7)) =f(16)=85$

Therefore, we conclude:

$f(g(7)) =85$

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

This is worth 16 points if you show work you will get the Brainliest answer if your unable to show work type it for your explana

Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A student is considering publishing a new magazine aimed directly at owners of Japanese automobiles. He wanted to estimate the f

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

Check Explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Confidence Interval for the population mean is basically an interval of range of values where the true population mean can be found with a certain level of confidence.

Mathematically,

Confidence Interval = (Sample mean) ± (Margin of error)

With p(japan) representing the true population proportion of US automobile that are made in Japan, the computer output 90% confidence

0.29938661 < p(japan) < 0.46984416

mean that p(japan); the true population proportion of US automobile that are made in Japan lies within the range of proportions (0.29938661, 0.46984416) with an assurance level of 90%.

b) 90% confidence mean that the true proportion may or may not be in the given range, but we are 90% certain that it does.

c) The confidence interval contradicts the politician's claim that "Half of all cars in the United States are made in Japan" because the proportion in the politician's claim, (0.50), does not lie within the range of values that our confidence interval says the true population proportion can take on; (0.29938661, 0.46984416).

0.50 lies outside of the confidence interval obtained for the true population proportion of US automobiles that are made in Japan, hence, the confidence interval contradicts the politician's claim.

Hope this Helps!!!

3 0

3 years ago