What issue led directly to the breakdown of national political parties?

2 answers:

8 0

If you are talking about the development of political parties, then the issue that led it to them was “the struggle over ratification of the federal Constitution of 1787” (loc.gov).
Federalists, such as Alexander Hamilton, wanted a strong, central government and the Anti-Federalists, like Thomas Jefferson, “advocated states’ rights instead of centralized power”. (Library of Congress)

shtirl [24]4 years ago

5 0

Answer:

The French Revolution led to the breakdown of national political parties.

Explanation:

American bipartisanship was born in the first years of independent life of the American nation under the influence of the events associated with the French Revolution. The international crisis caused by the events in Europe caught the United States between the two main fighting nations: France and Great Britain. The young and still vulnerable American republic was threatened by a conflict that it was not responsible for and could not control.

In this context, the struggle between two political groups led to the development of the first American political parties: the Federalist Party and the Republican Party. The federalists were led by Alexander Hamilton and identified with the interests of the most urban and commercial region of the country, the northeast. These proposed the development of the United States as a manufacturing and commercial country, so they defended the creation of a national bank, the payment of the national debt and the collection of tariffs on imported products. At the international level, the federalists viewed with suspicion the events of the French Revolution and did not hide their sympathies for Britain. The Republicans were led by Thomas Jefferson and represented the interests of the slave and agrarian south. These favored the development of an agricultural economy of smallholders and opposed tariffs and the creation of a national bank because they believed that they would affect the interests of ordinary citizens. Internationally, Jefferson and his followers sympathized with revolutionary France and manifested a clearly anti-British attitude.

You might be interested in

Why did Vasco de Gama enter India?

Neporo4naja [7]

<h2>Answer: To establish a commercial route between Portugal and India </h2>

During the fifteenth century the commercial route of spices from India (Asia) to Europe was monopolized by the Arabs. Before it was Italy that dominated this trade, but after the capture of Constantinople by the Ottomans in 1453, this changed, resulting in a more expensive purchase of spices for Europe (Portugal specifically, in this case).

However, in Portugal, the idea of carrying out an exploratory expedition to these Indian lands and inaugurating a new commercial route was already underway. Since the Portuguese navigator Bartolomé Díaz had managed to reach the Indian Ocean by crossing the southern tip of Africa through the Atlantic Ocean. Therefore, that part of the route was already known.

It is then how, after planning, studies and some unsuccessful attempt to start with such an ambitious expedition, the newly appointed king of Portugal, Manuel I, appointed Vasco da Gama to lead that expedition.

<h2>The initial idea was to reach India around the southern edge of the African continent, passing by the Cape of Good Hope and go in search of India in order to establish a safe and reliable maritime route. </h2>

Then, on July 8th, 1497, Vasco da Gama sailed, in what would be his first trip to Asian lands, from the port of Santa Maria de Belém, on the banks of the Tagus River in Lisbon and on May 20th, 1498, his fleet arrived near Calicut, India. After which the sea route was established from Europe to India.

5 0

4 years ago

How would blacks react after Union victories in the South?

Inga [223]

The blacks would be happy that the Union were winning because they were one step away from freedom from slavery

4 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

How did the military strategies of the north compare to those of the south during the capture of port royal

kirill [66]

During the American Civil War, the north and the southern armies had different goals, the Union at the beginning wanted to reunite the country, but later the goal changed to include the abolition of slavery. The Confederacy had a different goal, wanted to incorporate all slave states and secede from the Union.

To win the war the Union had to capture the Confederate territory and the Confederate just wanted to defend its territory.

After the capture of Port Royal, the Union noticed that it would be effective to make an economic pressure into the Confederates and establish a US military depot on the southeastern coast to carry out land and sea operations.

After the win of the Port Royal battle by the Union, the Confederates noticed that the coastline was too big to defend so the Confederates concentrated the defenses further inland, nearer the coastal railroads in the hope that reinforcements could be rushed to any danger point in time to prevent its capture.

4 0

3 years ago

Let me know y’all goin get some points 10

Dmitrij [34]

The answer is : Signs up with local election officials.

3 0

3 years ago

Why were sam adams and john hancock frustrated with government policies in the mid-1760s?

Oliga [24]

Both Sam Adams and John Hancock had anti-British sentiments. In the 1760s the British imposed regulatory measures in America so they could have greater authority over the region. John Hancock was influential and quite wealthy so he thought it was time to aid the American cause for independence from the British as he felt their influence in America was harming it.

6 0

3 years ago