I think the international poverty line is 4000?
Itsuki's withdrawal from all social interaction, likely the result of bullying.
Bullying is defined as the repeated and intentional harming and humiliation of others, particularly those who are smaller, weaker, younger, or otherwise more vulnerable than the bully. Bullying is distinguished from ordinary aggression by its deliberate targeting of those with less power.
Bullying can include both verbal and physical attacks, as well as threats of harm, other forms of intimidation, and deliberate exclusion from activities. Bullying appears to peak between the ages of 11 and 13 and then declines as children get older. Overt physical aggression, such as kicking, hitting, and shoving, is most common in younger children; relational aggression, such as spreading rumors and social exclusion, becomes more common as children mature.
Learn more about bullying here:
brainly.com/question/3499227
#SPJ4
Answer: Informational influence
Explanation: Information influence is about accepting new information that, as such, and adopted by us as accurate, influences our thinking and behaviour. This kind of information is also relevant to the environment, that is, when we find ourselves, for example, in a new community centre, we adopt the already established behaviour of that environment as accurate and relevant, but not without our consent. Only because we think that on the basis of that new information we acquire habits and behaviours that are correct, or because we want to gain knowledge that we agree is relevant.
In a word, Nora accepted certain behaviour that she may not have practised before, so she may have even modified her behaviour, because on the basis of influential information, she agreed to behave as she had seen, heard, experienced.
Research shows that when eyewitnesses to crimes are paying attention to the surrounding, small details while a crime occurs, they are <u>less </u>likely to accurately remember.
Eyewitnesses can provide very compelling felony testimony, however as opposed to recording experiences flawlessly, their reminiscences are susceptible to a variety of mistakes and biases. They (just like the rest of us) could make errors in remembering particular info and may even consider entire events that did not virtually happen.
Studies have shown that flawed eyewitness testimony debts for approximately half of all wrongful convictions. Researchers at Ohio state college examined hundreds of wrongful convictions and determined that more or less fifty-two percent of the errors resulted from eyewitness errors.
Learn more about Research here: brainly.com/question/968894
#SPJ4
