1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
maxonik [38]
4 years ago
14

What role did compromise and negotiation play in the constitutional convention? contrast that with modern politics?

History
2 answers:
docker41 [41]4 years ago
6 0
There was a significant amount of compromise and negotiation in during the constitutional convention. In order to set up the republic, representatives from all of the democracy gathered to dispute and discuss issues. One of the most contentious elements being slavery in the country. As such, negotiations led the the participants, to work further to balance state vs. federal rights. Often allowing for compromise to allow states to decide the issues that affected them most. 

Today's politics appears to be often one-sided and put forth as a "for us, or against us" type mentality. Meaning there is little room for negotiation or adjusting policy. Of course the inclusion in the constitution the separations of powers and the system of checks and balances still maintains one of the best political systems humankind as witnessed by the example of over 200 years of peaceful transfers of power from governing authority to governing authority, even though disputes and disagreements regularly occur.
Amanda [17]4 years ago
3 0
<span>Compromise was an incredibly important tool at the Constitutional Convention. The Delegates met together and worked together to compromise on everything in order to create a plan for a strong central government unit. When compared to today's government, the two parties are always on opposite sides of the aisle, both seem unwilling to give anything in order to reach a compromise, instead pushing solely for their entire agenda.</span>
You might be interested in
Which statement best describes the United States' changing role in the world during the twentieth century? a:It changed from a g
Luda [366]
The statement that best describes the United States' changing role in the world during the twentieth century was E.<span>It became a military superpower in the world but lacked a strong economy. The reason for the non strong economy was due to the Great Depression, and financial crisis of the 1920's.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Would an emperor be likely to attend an international meeting that included
Aloiza [94]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Yes, an emperor have to attend an international meeting where presidents, prime ministers, and other heads of the state also participate and attend the international meeting because an emperor is also a head of a country. There are many countries where monarchy also exists in this modern world so to represent its country the emperor or the king have to attend the international meeting.

7 0
3 years ago
Which region benefited most from early 19th century economic policies in the United States such as the Tariff Act of 1816?
adoni [48]
<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "the North", since these tariffs were mostly applied to the importation of manufactured goods. </span></span><span />
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which two arguments were made by opponents of women's suffrage? Women should not vote because they did not own property. Women s
Dominik [7]

Answer:

Which two arguments were made by opponents of women's suffrage? Women should not vote because they did not own property. Women should not vote because they belonged in the home. Women should not vote because many men could not vote. Women should not vote because they were too emotional. Reset

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which landmark Supreme Court case defined the scope of national power by teletiny he commerce clause to
Masja [62]

Answer:

<h3>Ogden. Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824), U.S. Supreme Court case establishing the principle that states cannot, by legislative enactment, interfere with the power of Congress to regulate commerce.</h3><h3>Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: [The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; The significance of the Commerce Clause is described in the Supreme Court's opinion in Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1</h3><h3>The Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution provides that the Congress shall have the power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. The plain meaning of this language might indicate a limited power to regulate commercial trade between persons in one state and persons outside of that state</h3>

Explanation:

<h3>mark as brainliast</h3><h3>indian genius sarthak</h3>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did non violent protest affect the UFW's cause?
    13·2 answers
  • Stephen Douglas was challenged by _______ in the Illinois senate race of 1858.
    5·1 answer
  • What are three foods or treats that the Aztec consumed that we still eat today? Describe how each was prepared or how it was use
    5·1 answer
  • Which scenario is an example of a person expressing a point of view about an issue?
    11·1 answer
  • Word occupation that does technology improve or control our lives​
    13·1 answer
  • The Ancient Egyptians had three seasons that were built around the yearly flooding of the Nile River.
    7·1 answer
  • Brainstorm an idea for an amendment to the Constitution. What change do you think would make a positive difference in the United
    9·2 answers
  • Why do you think Martineau Was concerned with the morals of the factory owners? Did their morals, or lack there of, contradict a
    15·1 answer
  • Sequence of UN Strategies.​
    14·1 answer
  • Where did people move to as the Sahara desert expanded?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!