Hello! I would say the correct answer here is B. False.
As these topics are highly debatable and have many different viewpoints varied by factors such as upbringing, location, and life experience, they cannot be entirely solved. Eliminating these issues and falling under one standard would represent a utopian and realistically unachievable world. Without the world’s diversity the whole world would be “in uniform” (one of my favorite phrases from The Great Gatsby) and the creativity and culture would cease to exist. So, since these issues are unable to be resolved, empirical research is not applicable in a solution to them.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
Answered below
Explanation:
Examples of leaders who act differently to what they say are corrupt police officers. Police officers are leaders in the enforcement and abidance to the law. When a corrupt police officer goes against the law in letting criminals go free or in arresting innocent people, then their credibility is destroyed. This creates a lack of confidence in the ability of such a leader to be an effective leader.
A corrupt police officer who goes against the law takes away my trust in him and makes me see him as unreliable and unprofessional.
Such leaders would find it difficult to regain the trust their followers had in them because they have proved themselves unreliable and ineffective in their service to their followers.
The correct answer would be, 4th Amendment.
A police officer learns that Julie and George Hammerstone are growing and selling marijuana out of their home on Stewart Avenue. 4th Amendment limits the officer's actions in regards to searching this home for evidence.
Explanation:
4th Amendment, is basically a constitutional Act in the United States Constitution. This was the part of the Bill of Rights.
This law gives protection to people. According to this law, unlawful searches and seizures are prohibited by the officers in homes, offices, shops, etc. Police cannot search anyone's house, business, etc, without the warrants or a solid cause.
As given in this question, a police officer cannot search George and Julie's house just on a doubt. He must first do the full homework and gather evidence against them and needs to get the search warrant in order to enter their home.
Learn more about Fourth Amendment at:
brainly.com/question/3103560
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
he important aspect of history written by British historians in India was that they divided the history into ancient period,medeival period and modern period
Explanation:
<u>Answer:
</u>
Duration would not be an appropriate measure for corporate common stock.
Option: (C)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- By considering duration as a measure, only the anticipated price movement of fixed income security for a given change in given market interest rate levels could be determined.
- On the other hand, duration would be an appropriate measure for bonds and preferred stocks as they are fixed income securities Whereas, common stock is not a fixed income security so the condition of duration would not be applicable.
