Why was the fugitive slave law of 1793 considered a danger to free blacks?

1 answer:

7 0

<span>The Fugitive Slave Acts were a pair of federal laws that allowed for the capture and return of runaway slaves within the territory of the United States. Enacted by Congress in 1793, the first Fugitive Slave Act authorized local governments to seize and return escaped slaves to their owners and imposed penalties on anyone who aided in their flight. Widespread resistance to the 1793 law led to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which added more provisions regarding runaways and levied even harsher punishments for interfering in their capture. The Fugitive Slave Acts were among the most controversial laws of the early 19th century.</span>

You might be interested in

Did queen Hatshepsut destroy her fathers monuments

s344n2d4d5 [400]

Answer:

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

Who was assassinated during a visit to sarajevo in bosnia?

Fynjy0 [20]

Franz Ferdinad was assassinated.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

In colonial America, women were expected to marry and run a household. They were responsible for household duties such as sewing

belka [17]

It is a secondary source and it's is reliable because they have been reviewed before publishing. The main idea is Women right how they are mostly denied of doing anything in early years.

<h3>What are secondary source?</h3>

This are data that are generated from a data base or other archived.

The individual didn't have access to the direct source but rather ask for opinions and findings from where similar thing have been done.

They can Interprete data or event using the primary sources to do so.

Therefore, It is a secondary source and it's is reliable because they have been reviewed before publishing. The main idea is Women right how they are mostly denied of doing anything in early years.

Learn more on secondary source below

brainly.com/question/896456

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Post a paragraph offering your thoughts on this issue: What should the US do about monopolies?

a_sh-v [17]

One way thing that the US could do about monopies is regulating them by breaking a monopoly up. In certain cases, government may decide a monopoly needs to be broken up because the firm has become too powerful. This rarely occurs. For example, the US looked into breaking up Microsoft, but in the end the action was dropped. This tends to be seen as an extreme step, and there is no guarantee the new firms won’t collude.

7 0

3 years ago

Please tell me if I'm right <br><br><br> Thanks

asambeis [7]

You are correct my good sir

6 0

3 years ago