1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
GREYUIT [131]
3 years ago
6

The graph of a linear equation passes through three of these points: (0,5), (2, 2), (3, 1), and (4.-1).

Mathematics
1 answer:
sdas [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

(3, 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

plotting these points on a graph, while (3, 1) may look like it's on the line, it is the only point that would involve changing the slope of the line, so that point cannot be on the line.

You might be interested in
PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME, NO LINKS, I JUST NEED THIS DONE​
lianna [129]

Answer:

Here is your answer

Step-by-step explanation:

B) 2x + 5 = 7

vertical line

C) 2x - y = 6

oblique line

D) 3y + 9 = 0

horizontal line

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A tire manufacturer is considering a newly designed tread pattern for its all-weather tires. Tests have indicated that these tir
Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

With outlier (102)

t=\frac{126.2-125}{\frac{9.138}{\sqrt{10}}}=0.415      

p_v =P(t_{9}>0.415)=0.344    

If we compare the p value and a significance level assumed \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly higher than 125 feet at 5% of significance.    

Without outlier (102)

t=\frac{128.89-125}{\frac{3.551}{\sqrt{9}}}=3.285      

p_v =P(t_{8}>3.285)=0.0056  

And we conclude that we reject the null hypothesis since p_v. So the final conclusion would be not use the method since the value of 102 observed can be a potential outlier, removing this value we see that we reject the null hypothesis and we have a significant result that the true mean is higher than 125.

Step-by-step explanation:

Previous concepts  and data given  

The margin of error is the range of values below and above the sample statistic in a confidence interval.  

Normal distribution, is a "probability distribution that is symmetric about the mean, showing that data near the mean are more frequent in occurrence than data far from the mean".  

Data: 129, 128, 130, 132, 135, 123, 102, 125, 128, 130

We can calculate the mean with the following formulas:

\bar X =\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n X_i}{n}

s=\sqrt{\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n (X_i -\bar X)^2}{n-1}}

\bar X=126.2 represent the sample mean    

s=9.138 represent the sample standard deviation  

n=10 represent the sample selected  

\alpha significance level    

State the null and alternative hypotheses.    

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the mean is significantly higher than 125, the system of hypothesis would be:    

Null hypothesis:\mu \leq 125    

Alternative hypothesis:\mu > 125    

If we analyze the size for the sample is < 30 and we don't know the population deviation so is better apply a t test to compare the actual mean to the reference value, and the statistic is given by:    

t=\frac{\bar X-\mu_o}{\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}}  (1)    

t-test: "Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine if the mean is (higher, less or not equal) to an specified value".    

Calculate the statistic  

We can replace in formula (1) the info given like this:    

t=\frac{126.2-125}{\frac{9.138}{\sqrt{10}}}=0.415      

P-value  

First we need to calculate the degrees of freedom given by:

df=n-1=10-1= 9

Then since is a right tailed sided test the p value would be:    

p_v =P(t_{9}>0.415)=0.344    

Conclusion    

If we compare the p value and a significance level assumed \alpha=0.05 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the true mean is not significantly higher than 125 feet at 5% of significance.    

Using all the data we see that we don;t have enough info to conclude that the true mean is higher than 125, but if we see careful 9 of the 10 values are over the limit of 125 feet. And if we repeat the procedure with the outlier of 102. We got this:

\bar X=128.89 represent the sample mean    

s=3.551 represent the sample standard deviation

t=\frac{128.89-125}{\frac{3.551}{\sqrt{9}}}=3.285      

First we need to calculate the degrees of freedom given by:

df=n-1=9-1= 8

Then since is a right tailed sided test the p value would be:    

p_v =P(t_{8}>3.285)=0.0056  

And we conclude that we reject the null hypothesis since p_v. So the final conclusion would be not use the method since the value of 102 observed can be a potential outlier removing this value we see that we reject the null hypothesis and we have a significant result that the true mean is higher than 125.

8 0
3 years ago
Two partners agree to invest equal amounts in their business. One will contribute​ $10,000 immediately. The other plans to contr
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

She should contribute $ 8369.38 ( approx )

Step-by-step explanation:

Let P be the amount invested by the other partner,

∵ The amount formula in compound interest,

A=P(1+\frac{r}{n})^{nt}

Where,

r = annual rate,

n = number of compounding periods in a year,

t = number of years,

Here, r = 9% = 0.09, n = 4 ( quarters in a year ), t = 2 years,

Then the amount after 2 years,

A = P(1+\frac{0.09}{4})^{8}

According to the question,

A = $ 10,000,

P(1+\frac{0.09}{4})^{8}= 10000

P(1+0.0225)^8 = 10000

\implies P = \frac{10000}{1.0225^8}\approx \$ 8369.38

6 0
3 years ago
Determine which property is demonstrated below;
aniked [119]

Answer:

  symmetric property

Step-by-step explanation:

The <em>symmetric property</em> is the one that tells you A=B means also B=A.

The obfuscating factor in this question is the renaming of angle SZW to angle WZS. Both names refer to the same angle.

3 0
3 years ago
Steve buys 14 ounces of kiwis and 2 pounds of peaches.How many more ounces do the peaches weigh then the kiwis?
8090 [49]
1 pound = 16 ounces

2 pounds x 16 ounces = 32 ounces for the peaches.

32 ounces - 14 ounces = 18

The peaches weigh 18 more ounces.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help fast!
    14·1 answer
  • 13 + (4 + 10) = 27 the numbers and the parentheses to create an equivalent addition sentence that illustrates the associative pr
    14·1 answer
  • Premises: All flowers are beautiful. All roses are flowers. Conclusion: All roses are beautiful
    13·1 answer
  • Write an equation in point-slope form of the line that passes through (-2,14) and is perpendicular to the line whose intercepts
    12·1 answer
  • ben has 6 pounds of bolts in his auto shop he has to seperate them into boxeseach with 1/3 pound of bolts how many boxes can he
    8·1 answer
  • There are 90 fith-grade students going on a feild trip. Each student gives the teacher $9.25 to cover admission to the theater a
    15·1 answer
  • 4. You have $40 in your wallet, but you do not want to spend all of it. You want to have at least some money left. You find a sh
    10·2 answers
  • A triangle has angle measurements of 30°, 70°, and 80°. What kind of triangle is it?
    12·1 answer
  • Suppose two rectangles are similar with a scale factor of 2. What is the ratio of thier areas? Explain.
    5·1 answer
  • Which model is 85% shaded?<br> Done
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!