The Articles of Confederation were discarded in favor of a stronger more centralized federal government because of problems in governing that were associated with weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles failed to allow the national government to collect taxes, resolve inter-state disputes, and govern effectively more generally. Therefore, at the Constitutional Convention they decided to scrap the Articles and write an entirely new Constitution.
The leaders of the Mayan were Itzamn and Kukulcan
Answer:
The British partitioned Bengal so that the province of Bengal can be easily and more safely governed compared to the large province being governed as a single province.
Explanation:
At the time of the partition, Bengal was the largest province of the Indian states under the Britishers. The Lieutenant Governor Lord Curzon believed that it will be easier to "divide" the province and rule if the province is made into smaller provinces.
Following the policy of "divide and rule", Bengal was partitioned into two- East and West Bengal, separating the Hindus and Muslim population. Though the 'alleged' intention was to separate Bengal and not on religious grounds, the separation ended in a chasm between the Hindus and Muslims. But the main reason for the Partition of Bengal was for administrative purposes, to make the governing of the provinces easier and more accessible.
Explanation:
<em><u>Yes, they do. It's like anywhere else. Nepal has a conservative society, so most people, particularly the older generation are reserved. They don't celebrate occasions like birthdays and anniversaries. Some may organize a puja for good health and safety. However, during the last few decades, the trend of modernization has influenced Nepal too. Most of the outgoing people follow Western trends like those events, celebrating the English New Year and other festivities.</u></em>
Answer: The pundit is using a NATIONAL DEFENSE ARGUMENT to justify the trade restriction.
Explanation: National defense argument is when someone is using the security of the nation to defend his argument, to be very important as the security of the nation is very important.
This type of argument always tends to use the fallacy of red herring to convince his audience about his argument. The argument sounds to be important as it used red herring to relate it's point to the security of the nation during wartime.
The pundit politician has used the fallacy of red herring to relate it's reason of increment in the tariff of semiconductor importation, to the security of the nation during war times. Therefore this is a national security argument.
