No but I’m sure at the time for them it wasn’t seen as bad had they known they’d leave a trail of famine, slave trading and small wars they’d maybe think twice but certainly there motives at the time was land, power and money
“That the subjects . . . may have arms for their defense” is the right listed in the English Bill of Rights and is the basis for the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.
<h3>What the second amendment ensures?</h3>
The Second Amendment of the US Constitution reads: "A nicely regulated Militia, being vital to the safety of a free State, the rights of the humans to preserve and endure Arms, shall now no longer be infringed."
The amendment was created in more hostile times to guarantee people and states' right to self-defense, and it enables US residents to keep and bear arms for such purposes.
The missing information in the question is given below:
“that levying money for or to the use of the Crown . . . without grant of Parliament . . . is illegal” “that it is the right of the subjects to petition the king” “That the raising or keeping a standing army . . . unless it is with consent of Parliament, is against law” “That the subjects . . . may have arms for their defense”
Thus, “That the subjects . . . may have arms for their defense” is the right listed in the English Bill of Rights and is the basis for the Second Amendment to the US Constitution.
Learn more about second amendment:
brainly.com/question/1750552
#SPJ1
Answer:
The federalists wrote 85 articles to the newspaper New York Times. ... They used the Pseudonym "Publius". "The aim of the writing the articles was to get support for the ratification of constitution.
The war served woman in that by women stepping up to take the jobs of men who were fighting, they got the chance to show their strength and independence. The world recognized that women actually could be heroes, or people that could do a tough job. This benefited women and they gained the respect of society, also giving a chance to advance their national rights.
