1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
astraxan [27]
2 years ago
7

How did the conflict in Rwanda represent the problems posed by the nationalism in Africa

History
1 answer:
garri49 [273]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

Rwanda conflict led to genocide actions between the Hutu and Tutsi, in 1994, was caused by series of events, majorly as a result of ethnicity, religion, resources, and poor economy. These issues have been known to reflect the difficulties posed by nationalism in Africa. Hence, the conflict in Rwanda represents the problems posed by nationalism in Africa by showing the following:

1. Conflict between ethnic and religious groups

2. Fights over resources and religious violence

3. Weak government and economy.

You might be interested in
Why did Pope Urban Il call for a Holy War, or Crusade, in 1095 CE?
stellarik [79]

Answer:

To free Palestine and Jerusalem from Muslim rule

I hope this is correct sorry if I'm wrong

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Which is the best way to measure public opinion?
ratelena [41]
The best way to measure public opinion is through opinion polls - B

With opinion polls you get an idea what is the general idea about a certain topic from the public, as you usually get a high enough sample to deduce the relevant information.

To answer your second question I would say it is either B or C as being a sole proprietor usually makes you subjec to being a small business or you're forced to use factors of production less efficiently. 
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What must have been allowed by the Romans for Christianity to spread so far and wide?
8_murik_8 [283]
By the third century, Christianity was well established in and around Greece and the Middle East, as well as in Rome, Alexandria, Carthage and a few cities such as Lyons in the 'barbarian' western Europe.

Christianity had largely failed to penetrate Egypt outside Alexandria, or much of western Europe. Even Italy, outside the city of Rome, seems to have largely resisted Christianity. It seems that the Egyptian and Celtic religions had not entered a period of decline and scepticism in the way that the Greco-Roman religion had done. However, there was no impediment to Christians preaching in those areas, other than a lack of interest on the part of the population.

Christian tradition suggests that the Christians suffered constant harrassment and persecution by the Roman authorities. However, Euan Cameron (Interpreting Christian History: The Challenge of the Churches' Past) says, "Contrary to popular tradition, the first three centuries of Christianity were not times of steady or consistent persecution. Persecution was sporadic, intermittent, and mostly local." Edward Gibbon (The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire) goes further and, on a number of occasions, praises the pagan Romans for their general tolerance towards Christianity. Widespread and persistent persecution of other faiths only really began with the Christian Empire.

There was a total of perhaps 12 years of official persecution of Christianity during nearly three hundred years in which Christianity existed in the pagan Empire. Otherwise, the Christians were largely allowed to worship as they pleased, and even to proselytise their faith, as long as they took care not to offend others or disturb the peace. This allowed Christianity to prosper and spread far and wide.

Hope this helps :)
5 0
3 years ago
was the trial of tears necessary to advance civilization as president Jackson said, or a cruel injustice to the cherokee
kaheart [24]
This would depend on your beliefs. Personally, I believe it was a cruel injustice to the Cherokee, and that the Trail of Tears was nowhere near necessary to advance civilization. However, this question is asking for your point of view on the matter. Using the information you have learned, reflect on the event and come to your own conclusion. Hope this helped! ^.^
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did conservative leaders react to nationalist movements in Europe in the nineteenth century?
DerKrebs [107]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

They were frightened by nationalist leaders and wanted to reduce their influence.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A policy that tries to avoid foreign alliances and involvement is called A) imperialism. B) isolationism. C) nationalism. D) res
    7·2 answers
  • If you had been in the audience, how would you have responded to Henry’s speech?Why?
    14·1 answer
  • How did John C. Fremont help the Americans to migrate westward and eventually wrest control of the land from Mexico.
    13·1 answer
  • A weakness of the Articles of Confederation was that the federal government
    12·1 answer
  • “The world on the turtles back” Answer the following questions properly (complete sentences and direct citations/quotations wher
    8·2 answers
  • Did the middle colonies have religious freedom
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following were not part of the Harvey Company? a. Harvey Cars c. Harvey Guides b. Harvey Airplanes d. Harvey Cabins
    14·1 answer
  • What would a modern Great Depression look like
    7·1 answer
  • Helppppp!!!! Moses is important in the history of the Israelites because A. He led the ancient Hebrews out of Egypt. B. He was t
    7·1 answer
  • Two adjectives or descriptive phrases that describe the term about Indian Removal Act?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!