Answer:
1.unless i ride the bus.
2. it takes 25 on a day without traffic
3, 2 hours opening the trunk
4. i havent seen him in 5 years.
5.to pay 35 dollars for their service.
6. is on a monday & i have school
7.the suspense
8. been so long since i last seen her,
9. so did my sister
10.good to do morning exercises.
Explanation:its common sense
8. planets in motion.
9. licked away
10. Our
11. could outrun
Answer:
E). The Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members.
Explanation:
As per the question, option E displays the assumption 'the Merchant Tailors' School did not reduce its fees for the children of the more affluent Guild members' on which the argument lies as it is rightly assumed by logic. This assumption clearly justifies the conclusion 'lesser affluent families receiving a fee reduction' aptly. The other options fail to validate the conclusion as it offers an illogical yet inappropriate claim. Therefore, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer as it reasonably justifies the claim/argument.
A parliamentary procedure has so many rules so as to carry out its main goal of reaching the best decision without bias.
If motions are brought up and are directly recognized without rules, do you think everything will be deliberated properly?
The organization strictly follow parliamentary procedure in order to reach a group decision with the least conflict. Therefore, everything can be narrowed down to "peace and order".
It's all for peace and order.
