In the 2000 election in the United States, the winner of the presidential election actually lost the popular vote, which illustrates an issue with electoral college in that it does not always represent the will of the majority of Americans.
Explanation:
The applicant who receives the most votes universal is said to have won the democratic vote. But the champion of the popular vote may finish up wasting the election like Al Gore did in 2000 and Hillary Clinton in 2016.
On 12 December 2000, the United States Supreme Court published its ruling in Bush v. Gore, finally beginning the presidential election of 2000 to an end. By a 5-4 vote, this Court overthrew a Florida State Supreme Court ruling, requiring that the recount of "under-votes" in the state of Florida cease. The election results, declared and published a month earlier, would, therefore, stand, giving Republican George Bush a victory in Florida, all 25 of its Electoral College votes, and a 271-266 national victory over Democrat Al Gore for the administration of the United States.
Issue of electrotate college:
It creates the opportunity for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote. This is more than a technical opportunity. It twists the presidential campaign, as alluded to yesterday, by incentivizing the parties to sign off the more than 40 states.
