1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ostrovityanka [42]
3 years ago
13

What cultural characteristic do these countries have in common?

History
2 answers:
White raven [17]3 years ago
8 0
Gucci Gang Gucci gang Gucci
Lapatulllka [165]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Saudi Arabia and Turkey enjoy a friendly and strong economic relationship, but have a tense and unstable diplomatic and political relationship. Saudi Arabia has an embassy in Ankara and a consulate–general in Istanbul, and Turkey has an embassy in Riyadh and a consulate–general in Jeddah.

You might be interested in
HELP WILL GIVE BRANLIEST<br><br> Describe European colonization of Indonesia and Vietnam.
jok3333 [9.3K]

It is Thailand they were never colonized by a European power.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the televangelists you just learned about started a political movement supporting conservative views? Why was this sign
german

Answer:

The answer is below

Explanation:

Jerry Falwell was widely known as a televangelist who founded the organization known as Moral Majority. The organization concentrated on the issue of the advancement of conservative social virtues and usefulness.

His movement and position was significant as the American political organization he founded was widely attributed to have made lasting impacts in American politics by creating the religious right as an important political player.

8 0
3 years ago
Which pair of phrases best completes the table?
user100 [1]

A because it claims in textbook

6 0
3 years ago
John Locke thought that people were neither good nor bad innately. How did Hobbes’s views differ from those of Locke’s?
Vladimir [108]

Answer:  A) Hobbes thought  people were innately violent.

<u>Further explanation</u>:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan </em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and violent toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a continuing challenge to the confederacy during the civil war
kkurt [141]
Two things that challenged the confederacy were diseases and population disadvantage. 
Diseases challenged both sides and killed more soldiers than the battles themselves. 
The other challenge was that the North has more soldiers, because the North has more people. So the Confederates were outnumbered. 
Hope this helps! Have a great day!
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Can you tell me the differences between The Code of Hammurabi and The Ten Commandments, please??
    5·1 answer
  • What was the main cause of the discovery of america
    11·1 answer
  • How did the neolithic revolution mead to political change?
    15·1 answer
  • Before and After of the Industrial Revolution:
    15·1 answer
  • What was the alliance system formed in 1955 that linked the soviet union and eastern european countries?
    8·1 answer
  • Why did some Central American nations object to Taft’s paying off their debt to Europe with U.S. dollars?
    13·1 answer
  • Which tactic did General Douglas MacArthur use in the Pacific?
    11·2 answers
  • What is one result of advance md in medical technology
    13·1 answer
  • What kind of "advance" or adjustment might the british have made to halt the escalation of the colonial rebellion?
    7·1 answer
  • In what ways was this election similar to the of politics we see today?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!