The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.
Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.
What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.
Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.
That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Answer:retroactive interference
Explanation:
Retroactive interference (retro=backward) , when we learn something new it tends to interfere with what we have learnt initially, this means the new learnt task interferes with the task we have learnt earlier such that we forget the earlier task.
This is more common if our memories have similarities such as learning a new langauge may tend to interfere with the old language that you have learnt.l before.
Having learnt Italy now interferes with the ability to learn Spanish.
Answer:
These institutions often work together to support victims of human rights violations.
Government institutions and non-government organizations work together to support the affected communities.
Hope this helps you out!!
Answer: Positive externality
Explanation: Positive externality is the concept in which the service produced and the consumption of that service will provide benefit a third party who is not a part of the process.
While producing fertilizer , it is providing a unintentional benefit to the community surrounding(third party) by keeping the insects away through exerting gases so that they don't cause insect bites or other problem.
Other options are incorrect because negative externalities are negative consequences face by the third party in a process. Comparative externality is related with comparison and pecuniary externality is increment or decrement in market price of service by action of economic actor .
Answer:
the answer is 2
Explanation:
if you divide 10 divided by 2 it gives you 5 and then subtract it by 2.2 = 2.8
there goes your answer.
