The Albany plan of Union was a plan to place the British North American colonies under a more centralized government. The plan failed because the colonies were afraid of losing their own autonomy. The British also considered the plan unnecessary because they wanted to make the management of the colonies simple. This shows that Britain was not interested in micromanaging the colonies
FCC Fairness Doctrine--this doctrine created in 1949 required news programs present a balanced report on issues.
This doctrine ensured that the news were presented fairly with both sides. This doctrine of reporting was in place until 1987 which then saw the birth of one-sided news broadcasting.
Answer:
- Their wives simply did not like the tortillas the corn hybrid made
- The farmers did not like the flavor
Explanation:
This is in relation to the <em>''The Introduction of Hybrid Corn to Spanish American Farmers in New Mexico'' </em>by<em> Anacleto Apodaca. </em>
The United States Department of Agriculture had tried to introduce a new hybrid corn to the Rio Grande valley in the 1940s to increase the yield there. They succeeded in doing so and the harvest became bountiful.
A couple of years later however most of the farmers had stopped planting the new seed and the reason they gave was because their wives did not like the tortillas made from the new corn and they did not like the flavor as well.
The correct answer is B: Foreigners would bring gifts for the emperor.
Further Explanation:
The tribute system was used by the Chinese for foreigners to gain access to passage across their lands. The foreigners would send a delegate ahead of the travelers and give gifts to the Chinese Emperor that were very valuable from their home countries.
After the gifts were given, they could pass and be allowed to trade in China's market. The Emperor would then return a gift to the foreigners or a "bestowel" that was equal or more valuable than the original gift the foreigners had given to enter China.
Learn more about the Tribute System at brainly.com/question/10578929
#LearnwithBrainly
Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely” (1887). Indeed, the concept of power can have decidedly negative connotations, and the term itself is difficult to define.
Sociologists have a distinctive approach to studying governmental power and authority that differs from the perspective of political scientists. For the most part, political scientists focus on studying how power is distributed in different types of political systems. They would observe, for example, that the United States’ political system is divided into three distinct branches (legislative, executive, and judicial), and they would explore how public opinion affects political parties, elections, and the political process in general. Sociologists, however, tend to be more interested in the influences of governmental power on society and in how social conflicts arise from the distribution of power. Sociologists also examine how the use of power affects local, state, national, and global agendas, which in turn affect people differently based on status, class, and socioeconomic standing.
Many scholars adopt the definition developed by German sociologist Max Weber, who said that power is the ability to exercise one’s will over others (Weber 1922). Power affects more than personal relationships; it shapes larger dynamics like social groups, professional organizations, and governments. Similarly, a government’s power is not necessarily limited to control of its own citizens. A dominant nation, for instance, will often use its clout to influence or support other governments or to seize control of other nation states. Efforts by the U.S. government to wield power in other countries have included joining with other nations to form the Allied forces during World War II, entering Iraq in 2002 to topple Saddam Hussein’s regime, and imposing sanctions on the government of North Korea in the hopes of constraining its development of nuclear weapons
