Answer:
The conclusion "T" logically follows from the premises given and the argument is valid
Step-by-step explanation:
Let us use notations to represent the steps
P: I take a bus
Q: I take the subway
R: I will be late for my appointment
S: I take a taxi
T: I will be broke
The given statement in symbolic form can be written as,
(P V Q) → R
S → (¬R ∧ T)
(¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S
¬R
___________________
∴ T
PROOF:
1. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → S Premise
2. S → (¬R ∧ T) Premise
3. (¬Q ∧ ¬P) → (¬R ∧ T) (1), (2), Chain Rule
4. ¬(P ∨ Q) → (¬R ∧ T) (3), DeMorgan's law
5. (P ∨ Q) → R Premise
6. ¬R Premise
7. ¬(P ∨ Q) (5), (6), Modus Tollen's rule
8. ¬R ∧ T (4), (7), Modus Ponen's rule
9. T (8), Rule of Conjunction
Therefore the conclusion "T" logically follows from the given premises and the argument is valid.
Answer:
B
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1/2
Step-by-step explanation:
Pick two of the x's and y's
The first two columns in the table, the x's are -2 and 0 and the y's are 3 and 4.
The x value changes as a +2 and the y value changes from a +1 from the first two columns. Put the +2 as the denominator and the +1 as the numerator. 1/2
Answer:
15 students
Step-by-step explanation:
25% = 1/4, so you can just do 1/4 of 60 or 1/4 * 60. 60/4 = 15 students.
