The correct answers are A) It established a territorial government that was appointed by the president and E) It allowed for the settlement of the Unassigned Lands by US citizens.
The two statements that explain the purpose or impact of the Organic Act are: It established a territorial government that was appointed by the president and It allowed for the settlement of the Unassigned Lands by US citizens.
The Organic Act was passed in 1916 and it was created to the correct operation of parks and the laws to conserve these protected areas. This Organic Act defines the land areas and the resources for better management purposes and established the responsibilities of the National Park Service. The act was a great step from the US government to have a good park and recreation system in place for US citizens to enjoy and respect the protected areas.
Imperialism can be characterized mainly by a country's acquisition and colonization of land. an imperialist country will often take new land by force, and imperialist countries often promote nationalist views.
Answer:
The answer is actually B. and I hope that this helped you have a great day!
"Reconstruction" is actually has a double meaning: in addition to the physical act of rebuilding areas of the South is also refers to federal government intervention in the former Confederate states in order to monitor the treatment of former slaves. This period lasted until 1877.
The arrest of a criminal suspect.
If you've ever watched a television crime drama, you've heard the "Miranda warning" -- or at least the beginning of it: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney ...." There's a couple more sentences to the warning, but TV shows often cut to the next scene before hearing the arresting officer finish their recitation of the full warning.
Miranda v. Arizona was a Supreme Court case decided in 1966. Ernesto Miranda was accused of kidnapping and raping a woman. He confessed to the crime when interrogated by police, but attorneys argued that he did not fully understand his 6th Amendment rights. After the decision in Miranda v. Arizona, it has become standard procedure in all arrests that the arresting officers must clearly state the accused person's rights -- their "Miranda rights," as they have become known.
