In the summer of 1794, tensions between farmers and creditors in western Pennsylvania boiled over into violence. A group of armed farmers, calling themselves the "Associators," began to attack and seize the property of anyone they saw as an enemy. In response, President George Washington dispatched a force of 13,000 militiamen to put down the rebellion.
In a report to Congress, Alexander Hamilton described the events in Pennsylvania as an "insurgent" and "insurrection." By using these words, Hamilton was trying to downplay the seriousness of the situation and avoid calling it a full-blown rebellion. He may have also been trying to avoid provoking even more violence by using language that was less inflammatory.
The situation in Pennsylvania was eventually resolved without any major bloodshed. However, the episode showed how quickly tensions could boil over into violence in the early days of the republic. It also showed the importance of having a strong central government that was able to quickly put down any internal threats to the stability of the country.
Answer:
here!
Explanation:
goals: "Proclamation of 1763, proclamation declared by the British crown at the end of the French and Indian War in North America, mainly intended to conciliate the Native Americans by checking the encroachment of settlers on their lands."
goals: "The Quartering Act of 1765 required the colonies to house British soldiers in barracks provided by the colonies. If the barracks were too small to house all the soldiers, then localities were to accommodate the soldiers in local inns, livery stables, ale houses, victualling houses and the houses of sellers of wine."
hope this helps youu! :)
Answer:
Between 1800 and 1850 the United States had massive population growth. The population went from 5,000,000 to 23,000,000 in 50 years. Many people were searching for a way to make a living and the idea that there was free or low-cost farmland in the west pulled many people to the west.
Explanation:
Sample Answer
:(:
What arguments did the anti-federalists make against ratifying the Constitution? A argument there were three basic issues, whether the Constitution would maintain the republican government, the national government would have too much power, and the bill of rights was needed in the Constitution.
How did the federalists respond to the criticisms of the Constitution made by the Anti-federalists? They respond for every complaint with a reason why it's needed for the government to run smoothly. For some they also respond with a reason why their complaint is invalid.
Argument:
<em>The creation of the Constitution represented a remarkable example of constructive compromise because</em><u> it is a compromise between the government and the people, that states that people should act in a certain way to maintain peace and that the government should protect the people's interests and rights. </u>
A historical example that proves that the Constitution represented an example of constructive compromise is the Three - Fifths Compromise, where the framers of the Constitution reached to an agreement to represent three out of every five slaves in a state to determine their total population for legislative representation and taxes purposes. This Compromise was constructive because both slave states that had little free population and free states with a bigger population would be equally represented by the United States House of Representatives by the next ten years.