When they were at war again we were trading with both of them. They both attacked our ships because they didnt want to have the other profiting off us. So France started attacking ships enroute to britian and Britain started attacking ships enroute to france. This practically destroyed americans trade. The war between them had americans split. Some wanted to support france while others wanted to support britain. But the president George Washington decided something else. He decided that he would rather stay neutral in the war. This angered france who had expected our help since we had become a nation mainly thanks to them. They had expected our support. This triggered the XYZ event which led to the french representative demanding big bribes to keep the the peace. That how the old famous saying Not a sixthpence was born
please give me branlyist i only need 3 more to up
This close alliance, which was based on mutual respect and good treatment from both sides, led the natives to side with the french in their conflicts with the english settlers that came later in the 1600s and into the mid 1700s. Relations between the natives and english were not nearly as good.
Hope this help you :)
Mercantilism is really the idea that trade generates wealth, so i would have to say 3. establishment of subsistence agriculture
Answer:
Option: c. the overall poor economy.
Explanation:
Boris Yeltsin was a Soviet politician and later served as the first President of Russia. He began to lose support and became an unpopularity figure because of bad economic policies in the country. The economic conditions of the country under Yeltsin was in difficulty with corruptions and crimes. The shock therapy and economic policies introduced ownership of private property, free market, a stock exchange, commodities exchanges and private banks somewhat brought an imbalance in the country because it increased the cost of living and many people entered into deep poverty.
Answer:
B) Governments and citizens check one another's power
Explanation:
The second article talks about how the government keeps powerful people in check, and the latter half of it talks about how if the government is corrupt and isn't serving to protect the 3 liberties of the people then the people have a right to overthrow the unjust ruling.
