1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Furkat [3]
3 years ago
15

How did natan sharansky resist political oppression during the cold war?

History
2 answers:
dangina [55]3 years ago
5 0

He spoke out against the Soviet Union's refusal to allow Jews to immigrate to Israel.

Natan Sharansky is a notable former Soviet dissident, human rights activist, former Prisoner of Zion, Israeli politician and author.

He was a refusenik and dissident in the Soviet Union during the 1970s and 1980s and he spent nine years in Soviet prisons. He served as Chairman of the Executive of the Jewish Agency from June 2009 to August 2018.

N76 [4]3 years ago
4 0
He spoke out against the soviet union's refusal to allow Jews to immigrate to Israel.

You might be interested in
Pros and cons of constitutional monarchy
Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

Pros of Constitutional Monarchy. Unity. Security. System of Equality. Neutrality. Allows for Change in the Government.

Cons of Constitutional Monarchy. Slow Decision Making. Costly Form of Government. Difficult To Get Approval. Leadership is not always of Quality. Complex Government Structure.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
Fudgin [204]

Answer:

Put into your own words

As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution. The Supreme Court is "distinctly American in concept and function," as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed.

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did territorial expansion lead to the fall of the Roman Empire?
wariber [46]
The Roman Empire's fall was largely due to the army being spread too thin to defend the growing territory.  The army could not recruit fast enough to secure the huge increases in territory.  Also the relocation of men from their domestic lives within the city to the mobile army bases caused a lack of day to day workers within the city.  The economy suffered as result.
4 0
3 years ago
Question 9 of 10
Tanya [424]

Answer:

true its true

Explanation:

just because i took the test

6 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this history question!
lutik1710 [3]

Answer: The third answer

Explanation:

the ability to tax and spend public money for the national government.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What good and bad things did Charles 1st do
    7·1 answer
  • How did Pericles die? at the hands of the Spartan army at the hands of the Spartan navy at the hands of the Persian army during
    12·2 answers
  • A local government gets about the same amount of revenue from property, sales and income taxes as it does from?
    14·1 answer
  • A totalitarian ideology requires its citizens to flow their interest support government beliefs express individual opinions vote
    13·1 answer
  • Presidential primaries are important because
    5·1 answer
  • Did technology or migration do more to change antebellum America?
    10·1 answer
  • Do you think Napoleon is a great leader or dictator? Explain.
    5·1 answer
  • Washington is a major manufacturing center for?
    5·2 answers
  • Common Sense was a publication most influential in persuading colonists to support
    12·2 answers
  • What and when was the Progressive era?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!