Answer: <span>He wanted to create a place where he could practice his religion freely.
Explanation: He belonged to a religious group of Quakers, they were of a view that man-made rules were not fair and everyone was forced to follow them instead of following their own will and inner insight of the events happening around them. Thus, he wanted to acquire that land in New World (later named as Pennsylvania) to practice their religion freely and considered that place a safe haven for Quakers community. Religious tolerance was a prominent feature of his colony.
</span>
The Great Depression of the 1930s changed Americans' view of unions. Although AFL membership fell to fewer than 3 million amidst large-scale unemployment, widespread economic hardship created sympathy for working people. At the depths of the Depression, about one-third of the American work force was unemployed, a staggering figure for a country that, in the decade before, had enjoyed full employmentWith the election of President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932, government -- and eventually the courts -- began to look more favorably on the pleas of labor. In 1932, Congress passed one of the first pro-labor laws, the Norris-La Guardia Act, which made yellow-dog contracts unenforceable. The law also limited the power of federal courts to stop strikes and other job actions.
When Roosevelt took office, he sought a number of important laws that advanced labor's cause. One of these, the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (also known as the Wagner Act) gave workers the right to join unions and to bargain collectively through union representatives. The act established the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) to punish unfair labor practices and to organize elections when employees wanted to form unions. The NLRB could force employers to provide back pay if they unjustly discharged employees for engaging in union activities.
We probably wouldn't have had as much technicologic inventions and the leader system would probably be messed up as well.
They denied him his freedom because while he lived in a free state he was still considered property, and it also declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional because of the difference between slave and free states
