Hitler and Mussolini were very different people. Hitler’s early life, wartime
experiences, aims, how he came to power and how he ruled Germany were all
different to Mussolini’s rule over Italy. Hitler’s dour and colourless view
of life contrasted greatly with Mussolini’s larger than life approach to his
leadership. Both leaders left their countries with a economic and social debt to
the Allies which is still strong in the minds of many older members of the
<span>community.</span>
Reconstruction resolved issue linked with inequality of slaves in the State which was the key issue behind the civil war
Reconstruction was the time following the American Civil War, when efforts were undertaken to provide African Americans full freedom and constitutional rights following liberation. The following major steps were taken :
- The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution were introduced during the Reconstruction era, permanently altering the governmental structure and the meaning of citizenship in the United States.
- In most of the South, public schooling was intoduced which was completely absent for Black pupils back then
- New job opportunities were created for blacks to provide them with economic equality.
- During the Reconstruction era, 16 African Americans served in Congress, including two U.S. Senators: Blanche K. Bruce and Hiram Rhodes Revels.
Learn more about Reconstruction here:
brainly.com/question/24761999
#SPJ10
When a Melanesian tries to heal a wound by bandaging the arrow that struck him, he is practicing magic.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
Melanesiansare indigenous people of Pacific islands. They have their own culture and way of living which is quite different from the way of living of modern day man. They believe in the magic and the given practice is illustrative of it.
They try to heal the wound by bandaging or tying it with the arrow which caused the wound. This practise is essentially magic as they believe that this will heal the wound and help the injured in recovery.
Hernan Cortes (1485-1547) was a Spanish colonizer and conqueror, who leaded the conquest of the Mexican territories, that started in 1519 with the occupation of Veracruz. The tales about the sacking of the Mexican capital, Tenochtitlan, are still legendary nowadays.
After the takeover of Veracruz, Cortes gave the order of sinking his own ships (it was thought they were burnt, but nowadays that hypothesis is being questioned). Anyway, he destroyed his ships on purpouse to force his men to go forward and conquer the New World, both in the militar and spiritual (goal of spreading the Christian religion) dimensions.
- Agreement with his decision: of course it is an incredibly effective manner of ensuring that his men would be motivated to conquer the territory, mainly because they did not have an alternative choice. They had to become rulers there or be lost in the middle of unknown lands. It can be claimed how the ultimate goal justifies the means.
- Disagreement with the decision: it can be argued how unethical is that he prevented his men from deciding if they wanted to participate or not on the mission. He eliminated the choice.
The Supreme Court case that found the use of the grandfather clause unconstitutional is the Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347 (1915). In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the grandfather clause<span> exemptions to </span>literacy tests<span> were unconstitutional. It declared the grandfather clauses as </span><span>repugnant to the Fifteenth Amendment and therefore null and void.</span>
