<em><u>Question:</u></em>
In a circle with a radius of 12.6 ft, an arc is intercepted by a central angle of 2π/7 radians.
What is the arc length?
Use 3.14 for π and round your final answer to the nearest hundredth.
Enter your answer as a decimal in the box.
<em><u>Answer:</u></em>
<h3>Arc length is 11.30 feet</h3>
<em><u>Solution:</u></em>
Given that,
Radius of circle = 12.6 feet
Central angle = 
radians
To find: Arc length
<em><u>The arc length of a circle of radius "r" when central angle given in radians is:</u></em>
Where,
s is the arc length
r is the radius
is the central angle in radians
<em><u>Substituting the values we get,</u></em>
Thus, arc length is 11.30 feet
Answer:
Pattern is you add odd numbers, as in 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, etc.
Step-by-step explanation:
11 + 3 = 14
14 + 5 = 19
19 + 7 = 26
26 + 9 = 35
hope this helps
Answer:
h(8q²-2q) = 56q² -10q
k(2q²+3q) = 16q² +31q
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Replace x in the function definition with the function's argument, then simplify.
h(x) = 7x +4q
h(8q² -2q) = 7(8q² -2q) +4q = 56q² -14q +4q = 56q² -10q
__
2. Same as the first problem.
k(x) = 8x +7q
k(2q² +3q) = 8(2q² +3q) +7q = 16q² +24q +7q = 16q² +31q
_____
Comment on the problem
In each case, the function definition says the function is not a function of q; it is only a function of x. It is h(x), not h(x, q). Thus the "q" in the function definition should be considered to be a literal not to be affected by any value x may have. It could be considered another way to write z, for example. In that case, the function would evaluate to ...
h(8q² -2q) = 56q² -14q +4z
and replacing q with some value (say, 2) would give 196+4z, a value that still has z as a separate entity.
In short, I believe the offered answers are misleading with respect to how you would treat function definitions in the real world.
The equation is derived from the conservation of energy, specifically from potential energy stored at a given height in a gravitational field.
When potential energy is completely converted to kinetic energy you have:
(mv^2)/2=mgh divide both sides by the mass m
v^2/2=gh multiply both sides by 2
v^2=2gh take the square root of both sides
v=√(2gh) and working with imperial units for acceleration due to gravity, g=-32ft/s^2
v=√(-64h) but the change of h as it falls is negative h so
v=-√(64h) so if an object falls from a height of 88ft we have:
v=-√(64*84)
v=-√5376
v≈-73.32 ft/sec (to the nearest hundredth of a foot per second)
Note that this is the velocity, it is negative 73.32 ft/sec.
The question inadvertently asked for velocity and provided answers for SPEED. Velocity is a vector and has both magnitude and direction, whereas speed just has magnitude.
So its final speed is 73.32 ft/sec
So if they actually wanted velocity none of their answers is correct :P
