<h3>
Answer:</h3>
A). They are winner-takes-all elections.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why answer choice "A). They are winner-takes-all elections" is the correct answer because this is what our local, state, and federal elections use to elect someone for office.
The term "winner-takes-all" pretty much means who ever wins get everything, in this case the position in office. The winner-takes-all is implemented in the election because the person that has the most votes would win, so they would take the position in office.
The U.S has been using the winner-takes-all method for many years. This allows people to choose a representative that they think would be the best in office for the city, state, or country.
For example, the U.S President election runs by the "winner-takes-all" method because which ever candidate has the most electoral votes wins, or they just need to hit the 270 electoral votes to win. This is how "winner-takes-all" works in the elections.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
Answer:
the one that is closest to japan is Montana
Explanation:
Montana is only slightly larger than Japan:)
Answer:
Group polarization.
Explanation:
Group polarization is when inside a group what first was an inclination to some ideas, after the individuals talk, those same ideas become much more stronger and radical. As the exercise exemplifies, the jury is deliberating and their initial attitudes are leaning neutral to slighty toward a guilty verdict. After a few days of deliberation, their ideas have strengthened considerably toward a guilty verdict. That's a good example of group polarization.
Farmland because it would give the soil nutrients
the answer is the D) since it might happen that the country is in the middle of a big disaster and it is receiving hep and the gross domestic product is reflecting this help which doesn't mean that the economy of that country is healthy.
