Answer:
a. monopolistic elements in the economy will prevent an immediate sharp fall in prices as a result of decreasing demand
Explanation:
When there is recession the price of the factor goes down and with that, the insufficient demand for a certain good or services is eliminated. The reasoning is that the decrease in prices stimulates demand and adjust the market.
Keynes among other economist consider that unemployment increase during recessions because the nominal wages rate do not fall. As the union and worker do not want to see their wage decrease. Same is applied to prices which makes then inflexible in a downward direction.
While "supply creates its own demand" is "Says's Law" which is rejected in keynes main book "The general theory"
Hece option A is the only one which is true
In this question, we are not provided with the specific numbers that are necessary to produce a graphical approach. Therefore, we cannot provide that part of the answer. However, we are able to talk, in general terms, about what an increase of grain production in the United States would cause in the rest of the world.
This is an effect of what is known as globalization. Globalization refers to the integration of the world's markets in goods and services, as well as flows of investment and people across national boundaries.
In order for globalization to take place, several processes have to occur first. Nations begin specializing in the production of good and services in which they are relatively low-cost producers. This allows for mutual gains for people in trading countries. However, while some groups might benefit, some others might be harmed by this pattern, such as those producing the goods that compete with the imports. In this example, some countries might benefit, but those that compete with the United States in terms of grain production might be damaged by the increased production of the United States.
Answer and Explanation:
a. This is a fundamental risk case since there is a loss possibility. As the attack is done by the terrorists and the loss is definite in terms
b. It is a property risk as the house is damaged in a fire that resulted into a financial loss
c. It is a personal risk case as the head of the family is totally disabled that directly impact the family which leads to non-fulfillment of the financial liabilities so ultimately its an income loss.
d. It is a case of speculative as the investor purchase 100 shares that resulted in either profit or loss
e. This is a case of fundamental risk as the overflow of the river impacts the property of thousands people
f. This is a case of financial risk as the risk impacted the opposite changes in the price of the commodity, rate of interest, etc
g. It is a speculative case as the worker could either win or loss
