Answer:
China-Legislating number of children
Thailand-Contraceptive available
Kerala, India-Many educational opportunities for women
Explanation:
Some countries with increasing population problems recur to laws in order to reduce it. China's example was a tax law. If you have more than two kids , your tax were higher.
Answer:
39.992
Explanation:
divide 20 by 100 multiply it to 49.99 then subtract answer from 49.99
Answer:
B. there is a perfect positive correlation between the demands for two goods.
Explanation:
Bundling is a technique of combining two or more products and selling them together as one package.
This technique is most commonly used by many companies like Microsoft, McDonald's, etc.
Sometimes, the strategy of bundling doesn't pay off in some endeavours as the companies might not make profit or not make as much profit as was originally projected.
Other times, it has paid off handsomely.
À company can decide to bundle products like a mouse, a keyboard, a USB drive and a monitor to sell as one package and not sell them individually, this is known as "pure bundling".
There is an increase in revenue when the change in value of one of the product in the bundle is equally proportional to the change in value of the other product in the bundle.
The correct answer for this question is a. True. Hope this helps you fulfill your desires.
Answer:
Efficiency variance = $851 favorable
Explanation:
<em>Variable overhead efficiency variance: A variance is the difference between a standard cost and the actual cost. Variable overhead efficiency variance aims to determine whether or not their exist savings or extra cost incurred on variable overhead as a result of workers being faster or slower that expected.
</em>
<em>Since the variable overhead is charged using labour hours, any amount by which the actual labour hours differ from the standard allowable hours would result in a variance</em>
To calculate this variance, we do as follows:
Hours
4,700 should have taken(4,700 × 0.70 hrs) 3,290
but did take (i.e actual hours) 480 <u> 3,060</u>
Efficiency variance in hours 70 unfavorable 230 favourable
Standard variable overhead rate <u>× $3.70</u>
Efficiency variance <em> </em><u><em> 851
</em></u>
Efficiency variance = $851 favorable
<em> </em>
<em />
