This can be solve.. By
albido value: ratio of reflected solar radiations to absorbed solar radiations.
Snow has high albido value.. This means it reflects back most of the radiations..
Water bodies have low albido value..
They absorb much radiations
desert has higher albedo value than forests.. This indicates forests absorb more radiations.
The observation from the first question would tend to disprove the idea that evolution is based on b. inheritance of acquired characteristics because according to the experiment <span>theory of <span>adaptation was taken as a basis.
The answer for the next question is definitely adaptation as at first every live -being should get used to its environment in order to develop and so on.</span></span>
The answer is A. Pollutant
Answer:
The answer is <em>false</em>.
Explanation:
Although very popular in crime novels and TV shows, microscopic hair analysis isn't as reliable as it may seem. It was widely used during 1950-s and 1960-s as the best test to match a hair sample with the suspect, but modern tests proved it to be wrong. Microscopic analysis can give some information about the hair sample such as origin (human, animal or synthetic fiber), color, pigment distribution... For example, if the hair sample found was brown, and the suspect was black-haired, we could claim that he was Innocent. But if the found hair was black, does that mean that we could be absolutely sure that the suspect is guilty? Of course not, microscopic analysis can not provide evidence for that claim. On the other hand, the best method for matching biological samples, at the present time, is DNA analysis.
b. one new offspring that is identical to the parent
I hope I helped:)
Please leave thanks