From the options presented, the excerpt that best supports the author's premise that war does not distinguish between military and civilian acts of battle is:
D."Evidently this was no vulgar assassin. The liberal military code makes provision for many kinds of persons, and gentlemen are not excluded."
The key to understanding this is in the second sentence: "<u>the liberal military code makes provision for many kinds of persons, and gentlemen are not excluded." </u> more specifically in the word "gentlemen", military members are never referred as gentlemen. So, one can agree with the fact both military members as well as "gentlemen" are included in the savage warlike category
So, for the reasons presented above, the final answer is:
D."Evidently this was no vulgar assassin. The liberal military code makes provision for many kinds of persons, and gentlemen are not excluded."
Answer:
unique or famous
but I think mainly unique
Your answer is false buddy you have to give credit to the origin.
Answer:Dark Romanticism, in which he uses a despairing, more mysterious style to portray nature, imagination, & self-reflection. Is the answer
Explanation: I just took the quiz
<span>Strong language often means strong feelings. You are more likely to use swear words or just very expressive language when you are feeling strong emotions, such as agitation, anger, rage, etc. When you are feeling weak emotions, you are more likely to be controlled and behaved and not use strong language.</span>