A)They present an alternative view and can later influence Congress to enact legislation or the Supreme Court to reconsider its earlier position
Answer:
The Incas relied on trade with the Andean cultures for no-agricultural goods.
or
The Incas conducted little trade as the emperor owned all property
Explanation:
I'm not sure what your doing (I have little information on what this is) so i hope one of these work!!
Answer: D) the federal government used force to enforce the laws of the
Explanation: The Whiskey Rebellion (1791-1794) was an early challenge to the authority of the government created by the U.S. Constitution. The use of national military troops to quell the insurrection showed that the federal government would use force to execute the laws of the land. The supremacy of the national government is guaranteed in Article VI of the U.S. Constitution.
They attacked only at night under the cover of darkness. Their tactic was to engage in small skirmishes in the South Vietnamese countryside where they were familiar with the area. They used guerilla warfare and had their trip wires and pits with sharpened bamboo stakes to demobilize the enemy. After the battle, they escaped back to the jungle.
I'm a fan of historian Michael Wood! One of my favorite items from him was the BBC documentary series, "In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great."
The quote you mention from Wood comes from his historical researches regarding India. (You could also look for his BBC documentary series, "The Story of India.") The "rejection of a whole way of understanding history" was the way that Wood described the actions of Asoka (or Ashoka -- you'll see both spellings). Asoka was ruler from 268 to 232 BC of lands that would later become known as India. Asoka was a great conqueror but also someone who found enlightenment through Buddhism. After conquering the Kalinga region in eastern India, rather than feeling some great rush of pride or accomplishment because of their victory, Asoka felt guilty. So he worked hard to improve the lives of the Kalinga people that he had conquered. This was what Wood was referring to when he said Asoka's attitude/approach "was a rejection of a whole way of understanding history." Conquest was not something to be celebrated triumphantly. Rather, the conquerors had an obligation to those whom they had conquered.
