Answer: D. The actual value of the contract is less than $30 million for each year he plays.
Explanation:
Given that Mark sherzer will be paid $15 million per year for 14 years reflects a contract whose value at the time of signing is ($15 million × 14) = $210 million. However, the payment would not be paid at the of signing but spread over a period of 14 years with $15 million being splashed out annually. However, considering the time value of money, whereby the present value of a fixed amount decreases with time. Hence in actual sense, the $210 million face worth of the contract will actually be less than $30 million [$210/7(playing years)] as time progresses on the fixed amount paid yearly due to reduction in the value of the present value as time progresses.
Answer:
Excess demand
Explanation:
The equilibrium price is the price at which demand equals supply.
If price is below equilibrium price, it means the price is lesser than the equilibrium price, therefore the quantity demanded would increase.
According to the law of demand, the higher the price, the lower the quantity demanded and the lower the price, the higher the quantity demanded.
If price is below equilibrium price, the quantity supplied would fall.
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
$8.20 per pound
Explanation:
The computation of the actual price per pound is shown below:
Material price variance = (Standard price per pound - Actual price per pound) × Actual quantity purchased
-$7,000 = ($8.00 - Actual price per pound) × 35,000
$8.00 - Actual price per pound = -$7,000 ÷ 35,000
Actual price per pound = $8.20 per pound
Hence, the actual price per pound is $8.20 per pound
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered
Total Cost of <span>Insurance Coverage
</span>
The answer is explained in detail below
Explanation:
Labor, L = 2000; Capital, K = 3000
Labour constraint,
Capital constraint ,
Solving the equation further, we get
- The range for the relative price of cloth such that the economy produces both cloth and food is 2/3 and 2
- Low cloth production → economy will use relatively more labor to produce cloth → opportunity cost of cloth is 2/3rd units of food.
- High cloth production → economy dips on labor → taking capital away from food production → raising opportunity cost of cloth to 2 units of food.
- If relative price of cloth lies between 2/3 and 2 units of food, the economy produces both goods.
- If the price of cloth decreases below 2/3 → complete specialization in food production → low compensation for producing cloth
- If the price of cloth rises above 2 → complete specialization in cloth production → low compensation for producing food
