This passage is an example of indirect characterization through dialogue. I the conversation there is not much content to characterize Pat and Terrence but the audience can get to understand some things about each one's personality. The audience can infer that Terrence is more direct and extrovert while Pat is shy and introvert but there are not as many clues to be sure about this inferences.
Answer:
Explanation:
Here is the answer hope it helped <3
Answer:
Personification
Explanation:
Definition of personification
Not sure about number three in regards to the literary movement; however, i can help you with the last two.
"the collars belonging to the cats" -- there are multiple collars, and multiple cats. the way to represent this is "the cats' collars." you add the apostrophe to the cats, because the multiple cats own the collars.
"the notebooks belonging to Janet" -- here, you have multiple notebooks, but only one janet. the way to show this is "Janet's notebooks." the possessive s is added to janet's name to show that the notebooks are hers. the possessive s or apostrophe would not apply to notebooks, because the notebooks don't own anything. only janet owns something.
Answer:
yes she kisses back, before that they were flirting, and saying poems to one another . She means that Romeo would be wonderful, no matter what name he was called. For the other questions, students’ answers will vary a bit. Names, they might argue, actually do matter and Juliet is somewhat wrong. If, for example, your parents were hippies and named you Moonbeam Smith, you might have grown into a different version of yourself because of the way the world treats someone named Moonbeam. It’s fun to think about how your name influences people’s reactions to you. The answers to the second part will vary and often lead to an interesting full-class discussion.
Explanation:
He believes that dreams hold the secret of your fate/
destiny. He would agree with modern dream interpreters that the subjects of our dreams tell us a lot about
our lives
