1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
amid [387]
3 years ago
11

Elise's health insurance policy has a deductible of $500, a $20 copayment on doctor visits, and coinsurance of 10% on all expens

es other than those for which there are copayments. She visited the doctor four times last year (doctor's fee is $40 per visit) and underwent a surgery that cost $3,000. If instead she had had a policy with a $1,000 deductible, a $10 copayment on doctor visits, and no coinsurance, which of the following is TRUE regarding her expenses (excluding the cost of the insurance)?(A) With the higher deductible, she would have saved between $70 and $249 relative to what she paid with her actual policy.(B) With the higher deductible, she would have saved more than $250 relative to what she paid with her actual policy.(C) With the higher deductible, she would have spent at least $300 more than she paid with her actual policy.(D) With the higher deductible, she would have spent between $50 and $250 more than she paid with her actual policy.
Business
1 answer:
jeyben [28]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The correct option is (c).

With the higher deductible, she would have spent at least $300 more than she paid with her actual policy

Explanation:

For her actual policy total expenses;

Deductible =$500

Copayment doctor visit= $20

Coinsurance of 10%= 10/100 ×500=$50

Doctor visit= $40 × 4= $160

Surgery= $3000

Total expenses= $3730

With the higher deductible expenses;

Deductible= $1000

Copayment doctor visit= $10

Doctor visit= $40×4= $160

Surgery= $3000

Total expenses= $4170

Difference in expenses= $4170-$3730= $440

Therefore option (c) is the right option.

With the higher deductible, she would have spent at least $300 more than she paid with her actual policy

You might be interested in
Item 3Item 3 Cutter Enterprises purchased equipment for $87,000 on January 1, 2018. The equipment is expected to have a five-yea
Rus_ich [418]

Answer:

$27,400 and $59,600

Explanation:

The computation of the depreciation expense and the book value using the sum of-the-years'-digits method is shown below:

Depreciation expense is

= (Purchase cost - residual value) × useful life ÷ sum of years

= ($87,000 - $4,800) × 5 years ÷ (5 + 4 + 3 + 2 + 1)

= $27,400

And, the book value is

= Purchase cost - depreciation expense

= $87,000 - $27,400

= $59,600

8 0
3 years ago
Which one of the following descriptions best describes horizontal integration? 1) the economic development of the American West
blondinia [14]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
A particular stock has a dividend yield of 1.5 percent. Last year, the stock price fell from $82 to $68. What was the return for
alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

The return for the year is -15.57%.

Explanation:

We have the formula to calculate Return for the year as:

* Return for the year = Dividend yield + Capital Gain/(Loss).

in which:

* Dividend yield is given at 1.5%;

* Capital Gain/(Loss) = Price at year end/ Price at the beginning of the year - 1 = 68/82 -1 = - 17.07%;

So we have:

* Return for the year = Dividend yield + Capital (Loss) = 1.5% - 17.07% = -15.57%.

Thus, the answer is -15.57%.

7 0
3 years ago
The Dogwood Technology Company managerial accountant computes the May total variance report. The budgeted fixed overhead was $ 4
Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

$750 favorable ; $200 unfavorable

Explanation:

The computations are shown below:

For fixed overhead budget variance:

= Budgeted fixed overhead - actual fixed overhead

= $47,420 - $46,670

= $750 favorable

For fixed overhead volume variance:

= Budgeted fixed overhead - standard fixed overhead cost allocated to production

= $47,420 - $47,220

= $200 unfavorable

Hence we consider all the given information

8 0
3 years ago
Susan's father warned her about buying real estate. He told her that it was her responsibility to determine the facts about a pr
Margarita [4]

The legal issue that  Susan's father  was advising her about is: Caveat emptor.

<h3>What is Caveat emptor?</h3>

Caveat emptor is a Latin words which means let the buyer beware before buying or purchasing a property.

Hence,  Susan's father advising her about Caveat emptor which is why he told her facts to obtain a thorough inspection before buying or purchasing the real estate.

Learn more about Caveat emptor here:brainly.com/question/14565508

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Stocks A and B have the following data. Assuming the stock market is efficient and the stocks are in equilibrium, which of the f
    6·1 answer
  • You have a work meeting that starts at 1:15 pm. You arrived at 12:53 pm. How many minutes early were you?
    13·2 answers
  • Consider the following balance sheet for the Wahoo Bank. Use it to answer the two questions that follow. Use a required reserve
    11·1 answer
  • Rock Solid Concrete Company does not offer customers a cash discount for early payment of their accounts receivable. As a result
    6·1 answer
  • The global air-traffic control system and the world's major stock markets are examples of what kind of systems?
    8·1 answer
  • 20 POINTS! Accounting Help!!! &lt;3
    5·1 answer
  • A low-cost leader can translate its low-cost advantage over its rivals into superior profit performance by
    5·2 answers
  • Tharaldson Corporation makes a product with the following standard costs:
    10·1 answer
  • Why do you think governments frequently attempt to control apartment rents but not house prices?
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Take a moment to reflect on the process of creating your personal budget. What was the most challenging part of creating your
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!