Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
The price earnings ratio for Beta corporation is 8 times
Explanation:
The formula for price-earnings ratio is the stock market price divided by the stock earnings per share.
The stock market price has been given as $52 per share
the earnings per share=net income-preferred dividends/weighted average number of shares
net income is $325,000
preferred dividends is $0
weighted average number of shares is 50,000
earnings per share=($325,000-$0)/50,000=$6.5
price earnings ratio=$52/$6.5= 8 times
Answer:
the options are missing, so I looked for them:
a. The buying of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
c. The selling of government bonds leads to lower interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
d. The buying of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
the answer is:
b. The selling of government bonds leads to higher interest rates, thereby reducing private investment.
Explanation:
The crowding out effect happens when the government increases its spending level in order to engage in an expansionary fiscal policy but someone needs to pay for this extra spending. In order for the government to finance their spending, they have to choose to either increase taxes or issue more debt. When they issue more debt, they end up decreasing private investment since money that could be used by private companies is used by the government instead.
1. Accounts receivable are found on the balance sheet.
2. Notes payable are found on the balance sheet.
3. Advertising expense is found on income statement
Answer:
a. No, because Shelby made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about a material fact.
Explanation:
Peggy made an offer to sell the dog for $800, they didn't discuss the dog's ancestry and Shelby wrongly assumed the dog was from champion lines and agreed to buy the dog for $800.
Based on further investigations, she discovered the dog was worth just $200.
She cannot rescind the contract because she wrongly assumed the dog's value not an error about à material fact. Peggy sold the dog at her own rates and Shelby bought the dog while wrongly assuming the value, so she cannot cancel the contract based on that.
