Answer:
The Dred Scott decision was the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on March 6, 1857, that having lived in a free state and territory did not entitle an enslaved person, Dred Scott, to his freedom. In essence, the decision argued that, as someone's property, Scott was not a citizen and could not sue in a federal court.
Explanation:
Many reasons... First of all they should not have involved the United States of America, even Hitler knew that to win a war, you don't involve the Americans, you can even find quotes of Hitler talking about that. Even the Admiral in charge of the attack on Pearl Harbor knew it was a horrible idea "I can run wild for six months … after that, I have no expectation of success".
Other than involving the Americans, the Japanese should've attack up into the USSR (Russia) opening up a new front and forcing the Russians to move man power to their east.
Another is that Japan often ignored their German allies when they advised against certain campaigns and attacks, which were strategically horrid ideas.
Also, nukes.
Answer:
The Israelites were upset with the hardships of life in the desert
Explanation:
they had to have mighty faith and trust that God was going to bring them to the promised land
Answer:
I think its A not really sure tho
<u>Answer:</u>
The term 'bonding' with respect to political parties and government means coming together on the grounds of similar ideologies and work agendas.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Bondings are formed at various levels in various disciplines of work. Some of these bondings re deliberate whereas some others are natural.
- When two political parties bond together, they have a common ideological base.
- Similarly, when two distinct governments form a deliberate bonding, it is for the cause of working on a common developmental program.
