Answer:
Explanation: There is a high possibility that the rise in taxes will negate the impact of rising government spending which would leave Aggregate Demand (AD) unchanged. However, it is possible that increased spending and rise in tax could lead to an increase in GDP.
In a recession, consumers may reduce spending leading to an increase in private sector saving. Therefore a rise in taxes may not reduce spending as much as usual.
The increased government spending may create a multiplier effect. If the government spending causes the unemployed to gain jobs then they will have more income to spend leading to a further increase in aggregate demand. In these situations of spare capacity in the economy, the government spending may cause a bigger final increase in GDP than the initial injection.
However, if the economy is at full capacity, the increase in government spending would tend to crowd out the private sector leading to no net increase in Aggregate demand from switching from private sector spending to government sector spending.
Answer:
This will most likely be Representative
Explanation:
This is due to them having different chapters in different states. It will be significantly harder for them to get everyone's vote directly, because there would just be too many of them in different locations.
Additionally, a chapter is a segment of a larger group. Meaning that each chapter will be led by different people, so it would make sense that the leaders of each chapter will act as a representative for those within that particular segment.
I hope this makes sense :)
C; they cannot hold jobs.
This is false, if they can get in they can get a job. Unless they get kicked out.
Answer:
The numerous factors are responsible for the loss of Biodiversity (Figure 1) such as
<h3> * pollution, habitat loss, hunting, introduction of invasive species, overexploitation of preferred species, climate change, and natural disasters. Figure 1: The causes of Biodiversity loss.</h3>
James oglethorpe founded it
