Answer:
The answer is nucelous I'm pretty sure!!
Sir Edward Burnett Tylor (2 October 1832 – 2 January 1917) was an English anthropologist, the founder of cultural anthropology.[1]
Tylor's ideas typify 19th-century cultural evolutionism. In his works Primitive Culture (1871) and Anthropology (1881), he defined the context of the scientific study of anthropology, based on the evolutionary theories of Charles Lyell. He believed that there was a functional basis for the development of society and religion, which he determined was universal. Tylor maintained that all societies passed through three basic stages of development: from savagery, through barbarism to civilization.Tylor is a founding figure of the science of social anthropology, and his scholarly works helped to build the discipline of anthropology in the nineteenth century.He believed that "research into the history and prehistory of man could be used as a basis for the reform of British society."Tylor reintroduced the term animism (faith in the individual soul or anima of all things and natural manifestations) into common use. He regarded animism as the first phase in the development of religions.
3 effects
1) it made the English king really mad
<span>2) Major punishments were imposed on Boston colonists </span>
<span>3) Warrants were issued for the colonial group known as the Sons of Liberty
</span>
<span> The rebels took the barrels of tea and tossed them into the </span>Boston Harbor<span>, giving the historic event its name. However, this is not the only things that happened – the British retaliated with the </span>Coercive Acts<span>, otherwise known as the Intolerable Acts. The Intolerable Acts included a series of laws that 1) Closed Boston Harbor 2) Banned town meetings, disallowing the self-government that the colonies were stretching towards 3) (and probably the most infamous of all) the </span>Quartering Act<span>. The Quartering Act allowed British soldiers to stay in the homes of colonial citizens and take whatever food they may happen to "need." The outrage this act caused the future creation of the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution – banning soldiers from quartering in the homes of citizens. </span>
Answer:
The answer is theory.
Explanation:
A theory is described as a confirmed explanation for natural phenomena, which has basis on scientific knowledge. This implies that a theory can be proved or disproved using tests.
The term is slightly different from a <u>hypothesis</u>; a hypothesis is a possible explanation that has <u>yet</u> to be confirmed through scientific tests.
Answer:
Stone were used
Bone
Explanation:
Throughout the Paleolithic, humans were food gatherers, depending for their subsistence on hunting wild animals and birds, fishing, and collecting wild fruits, nuts, and berries. The artifactual record of this exceedingly long interval is very incomplete; it can be studied from such imperishable objects of now-extinct cultures as were made of flint, stone, bone, and antler. These alone have withstood the ravages of time, and, together with the remains of contemporary animals hunted by our prehistoric forerunners, they are all that scholars have to guide them in attempting to reconstruct human activity throughout this vast interval—approximately 98 percent of the time span since the appearance of the first true hominin stock. In general, these materials develop gradually from single, all-purpose tools to an assemblage of varied and highly specialized types of artifacts, each designed to serve in connection with a specific function. Indeed, it is a process of increasingly more complex technologies, each founded on a specific tradition, that characterizes the cultural development of Paleolithic times. In other words, the trend was from simple to complex, from a stage of nonspecialization to stages of relatively high degrees of specialization, just as has been the case during historic times.
In the manufacture of stone implements, four fundamental traditions were developed by the Paleolithic ancestors: (1) pebble-tool traditions; (2) bifacial-tool, or hand-ax, traditions; (3) flake-tool traditions; and (4) blade-tool traditions. Only rarely are any of these found in “pure” form, and this fact has led to mistaken notions in many instances concerning the significance of various assemblages. Indeed, though a certain tradition might be superseded in a given region by a more advanced method of producing tools, the older technique persisted as long as it was needed for a given purpose. In general, however, there is an overall trend in the order as given above, starting with simple pebble tools that have a single edge sharpened for cutting or chopping. But no true pebble-tool horizons had yet, by the late 20th century, been recognized in Europe. In southern and eastern Asia, on the other hand, pebble tools of primitive type continued in use throughout Paleolithic times.
