Answer:
The researcher is confounding the sweetness of the cereal and the colour of the cereal.
Explanation:
Based on the results, it would be unclear if the subjects prefer the cereal because of the colour or because of the sweetness --it is only the latter the researcher wants to know about. This would be the dependent variable.
To fix this, the researcher should use the same colour for both sweetened and unsweetened cereal and have each preschooler try both. It is possible to colect data through observation (look at the children's reactions) or simply asking for their opinions at the end of the experiment.
Answer:
If it's a answer choice please pick D but if not then put this please social contract theory.
Explanation:
It turns into gasthat's what your answer will be
Hello there!
<span>When playing games of chance like slot machines or roulette, people often say that a particular outcome is "due," implying that one outcome is more likely because it hasn't happened in a while. this is a fallacy because in these examples the outcome of each trial is: Independent
Games or chance are random in nature. That is, the outcomes are influenced not by the previous outcome, but by probabilistic statistics. In slot machines or roulette, the outcome of each trial is Independent, meaning that it isn't influenced by any previous trial and that if an outcome doesn't happen in a while, it will not increase the chances that it will happen in the next trial.
</span>
The answer is Uganda because they have an autocratic government, and citizens under an autocratic government have little participation with the government.
hopefully my answer helps you
