Hi Kattie
Concurrent powers are powers that are shared by both; the state and the federal government.
I hope that's help !
Back then the supreme court <span>ruled that racially separate facilities, if equal, did not violate the Constitution.
This indicates that racial segregation itself is regarded as legal by the Supreme court. Because of this, many people in the south started to separate their establishment and creating racial discrimination in the society.
Even though there is a couple occurrence while the north tried to do discriminate minorities, the majority of people tend to despise this ruling and keep creating effort to override it.</span>
The major similarity between these two documents is that both reflect the idea that there should be limitations on the power of the government. This is an important idea that is one of the major bases of our entire system of government today. The major difference between the two is the degree of democracy that they contemplate. The Magna Carta is really meant as a contract between the king and his nobles, giving the nobles guarantees against the king. By contrast, the Declaration of Independence is a call for equality and rights for all people (or at least all white men). This means the Declaration is far more democratic than the Magna Carta.
Answer: I dont know what evidence you need but here's something I know...
So, Native Americans and English settlers in the New England territories first attempted a mutual relationship based on trade and a shared dedication to spirituality. But because of disease and other conflicts like trying to transform the tribes people into civilized Christians, it led to a deteriorated relationship and, eventually, the First Indian War.
Here's something interesting as well...some colonial leaders, such as the Puritan minister Increase Mather, believed that the illness and decimation of the New England Native Americans was an act of God to support the colonists’ right to the land.
:)
