The choices can be found elsewhere and as follows:
<span>A.eastern Europe and the Balkans
B.Germany and Italy
C.Italy and Anatolia
D.France and Iberia
I believe the correct answer is option A. The regions that were </span>affected by Crusaders traveling over land to their destination would be the eastern Europe and the Balkans. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
The history of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict began with the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. This conflict came from the intercommunal violence in Mandatory Palestine between Israelis and Arabs from 1920 and erupted into full-scale hostilities in the 1947–48 civil war.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
You forgot to mention or attach the lenses that you refer to in the question. However, we can answer is general terms.
When we talk about the term "lens" in research, we are referring to a specific perspective to examine the topic at hand or the study. We can use philosophical lenses, economic, organizational, social, or psychological theories.
So we do not what lens you chose, but whatever your choice was, this lens might change how you approach researching your topic, thus affecting the historical narrative, because that particular approach is going to offer you different sources, authors, perspectives, and research lines to be followed. Your historic narrative would suffer modifications because you will have so many approaches to include in your research.
They fought over the moral issue of slavery.
Butt this is what google told me xD
They fought over many reasons like...
Industry vs. Farming. ...
States' Rights. The idea of states' rights was not new to the Civil War. ...
Expansion. As the United States continued to expand westward, each new state added to the country shifted the power between the North and the South. ...
Slavery. ...
Bleeding Kansas. ...
Abraham Lincoln. ...
Secession. ...
Activities.
Answer:
One group Sifton believed to be the ideal immigrant was the American farmer. He thought that they made for excellent settlers as they would already be equipped to deal with North American conditions. Additionally, although Sifton departed from this tradition slightly, British immigrants were still highly valued. Besides that, Sifton saw Central and Eastern European agriculturists as prime candidates for Canadian immigration. He thought that these people, although not traditionally valued, were the ideal settlers for the Prairies especially as they were already familiar with agriculture, rural lifestyle, and harsh climates.
Explanation:
