Answer:
1. Do you have any cookies
2. We have a lot of
strawberries.
3. There is a cookie on the table
4. There isn't
5. I need an
apple on the table.
cheese in the fridge.
vegetables and fruits.
bottle of jam on the counter.
loaves of bread.
6. There is a cookie on the table
7. She wants a sandwhich
8. There is a slice of pizza in the box
tomato in my sandwich.
9. He needs an
orange.
10. There aren't any
bananas.
Explanation:
The answer is: C.) interfered.
In the passage from Alexander Pope's "The R*pe of the Lock
," the word <em>interposed </em>means to intervene between two parties. As a consequence, the word which comes closer in meaning is <em>interfered</em>, which implies taking part or intervening in an activity without invitation or necessity.
The rest of the choices are incorrect because <em>object </em>is used to express disapproval, <em>flee </em>suggests escaping from a dangerous situation, and <em>revive </em>means to restore to life or consciousness.
Annihilate and decimate both mean to destroy something or someone, but annihilate means to destroy something as a whole, and at a bigger scale, while decimate doesn't have to mean destroying the whole thing.
Eradicate and massacre are both violent words with the intent to convey destruction, but eradicate is a more general term, as massacre is meant to simple destroy/kill a large group of people.
Answer:
Yes, "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge" is an example of realism, even though Bierce employs romantic techniques in the story.
Explanation:
<u>Romanticism had among its characteristics the glorification of war and heroism. At first, that seems to be what Ambrose Bierce will do in his short story "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge".</u> The main character, Peyton Farquhar, is tricked into trying to burn a bridge that would allow Union soldiers to cross. Farquhar is a Confederacy supporter. He ends up being caught as a traitor and, when he is about to be hanged, he escapes. So far, Romanticism has prevailed.
<u>However, Bierce is only deceiving readers.</u> We are led to believe Farquhar has escaped, that the noose broke, and he found himself swimming in the creek, dodging bullets, free to return home. <u>We are soon disappointed</u>, however, as it is revealed that it was all his imagination - or even a hallucination - in the brief moments it took Farquhar to die. <u>The ending of the story is based on Realism. Far from being romanticized, it describes how horrid and gruesome death and war are, and how heroism is not always rewarded:</u>
<u><em>Peyton Farquhar was dead; his body, with a broken neck, swung gently from side to side beneath the timbers of the Owl Creek bridge.</em></u>
<u />
