Legislation often involves creating classifications that either help advantage or disadvantage one certain group of people, but not another. For example, states allow 20-year-olds to drive, but don't let 12-year-olds drive. Poor single parents receive government financial aid that is denied to millionaires. Now obviously, the Equal Protection Clause cannot mean that government is obligated to treat all people exactly the same. Only, at most, that it is obligated to treat people the same if they are in similar situations.Over recent decades, the Supreme Court has developed a three-rowed approach to analysis under the Equal Protection Clause. Classifications involving suspect classifications including race, are subject to closer scrutiny. A rationale for this closer scrutiny was suggested by the Court in a famous annotation in the 1938 case of Carolene Products v. United States.
The four major players are: Hamilton, Burr, Nathaniel Pendleton, William Van Ness.
Hamilton was the first secretary of treasure and he was against Burr during the duel. Burr was the Vice President to Jefferson and he was against Hamilton. Nathaniel Pendleton was a lawyer and Hamilton's second. William Van Ness was a lawyer and Burr's second.
Burr arrived first on the ground as had been previously agreed. When Genl Hamilton arrived the parties exchanged salutations and the Seconds proceeded to make their arrangments. There’s this musical that’s been getting some attention lately, Hamilton. Maybe you’ve heard of it. In the musical, Burr announces that there are 10 things you need to know about the duel, though actually he cites plenty more.
To learn more about Hamilton here
brainly.com/question/1523962
#SPJ4
Answer:
Your answer: Adolescent children should be guided and counseled by both their parents and, if feasible, specialists. This can assist to avoid reckless behavior in teens. Job-wise, this will assist mold youngsters to comprehend respect, self-discipline, and motivation, all of which benefit all ages.
Explanation:
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Your language shapes your perception is the answer..
Explanation:
The Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, otherwise called the etymological relativity theory, alludes to the recommendation that the specific language one talks impact the way one considers reality.
The long history of the speculation is portrayed with an accentuation on the progressive plan's standard for most early endeavors. This is trailed by a depiction of crafted by Sapir and Whorf, which withdraws particularly from this previous convention and has been persuasive in the contemporary time frame, thus the relationship of their names with the issue.
The answer is D waive his/ her right to a probable cause hearing
