Answer: the correct answer is (A) Linguistic relativity principle
Explanation:
In linguistics, the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis states that there are certain ideas or thoughts of an individual in one language that cannot be comprehended by those who live in another language. The hypothesis states that the way people think is hardly affected by their native languages.
The correct answer is rule of law
The idea of "rule of law" is considered a structuring principle of contemporary constitutionalism, being responsible for containing arbitrary temptations to exercise State power. It reveals the main idea that the exercise of political power must always take place in accordance with the law. Illustrative is that maxim of a law that orders are not obeyed because they were given by an authority: orders are obeyed when they are in accordance with the law and were given by authorities legally vested with the power to do so.
Trials will be conducted in: U.S District Courts
There should be at least one U.S district courts in every states of United states. During the trial, a Judge will conduct a series of questions to determine whether the defendant is actually breaking the law or not. and decide the future actions or punishment depended on the development of the case.
Answer:
A. positive cross-price elasticity of demand
Explanation:
For substitute goods we always have a positive cross-price elasticity of demand. The cross elasticity of demand for substitute goods is always positive because the demand for one good increases when the price for the substitute good increases.
For example, if the price of a
brand of beverage increases, the quantity demanded for a substitute beverage increases, this happens because consumers will quickly switch to a less expensive yet substitutable alternative. In the cross elasticity of demand formulae both the price and product are positive.
Broker Alex learns that his friend Joann is frustrated with the broker who listed her home. Alex encourages Joann to break her existing agency agreement and sign with him instead. This violation is an example of Contractual interference. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
Contractual interference.?</h3>
Generally, When someone intentionally and unlawfully causes a breach of contract between you and a third party, this is an example of tortious interference with a contract.
In conclusion, It comes as no surprise to broker Alex when his friend Joann is dissatisfied with the broker who offered her property for sale. When Joann's current agency contract expires, Alex pushes her to sign with him instead. Contractual interference is shown in this breach.
Read more about Contractual interference.
brainly.com/question/26413476
#SPJ1
