Answer:
A- Group think
Explanation:
In group think, bad decisions are often made because, rather than consider other alternatives, a group of people agree to a decision suggested by, in most cases, the most superior party in the room.
This form of thinking hides true opinions of other members of the group and though the decision is agreed upon, they could truly not want to be a part of the process.
In this scenario, there is an agreement with the Senior Executive on the plan of action however, nobody is interested in taking up the responsibility to follow through with the plan. This indicates a level of disagreement of other members with the plan regardless of the initially stated agreement with the plan.
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Emails show an agreement between the defendant and the plaintiff and as long as they are proved to be actually between the parties, it is considered evidence.
Answer:
D) It is generally more expensive to obtain than primary data.
Explanation:
A) It may not exist.
Problem. Primary data may not yet be available due to its sensitivity of the primary data.
B) It may not be relevant
Problem. Published data may not be applicable to your region. For example published data for Asia might not be applicable to Africa.
C) It may not be impartial.
Problem. Primary data used to create the secondary data might not treated all rivals equally.
D) It is generally more expensive to obtain than primary data.
Not a problem. Secondary data is not expensive as compared to primary data.
E) It may not be current.
Problem. Primary data collected might be out of date thus can not be used recent decisions as many things would have changed.
Answer:
ansure safe and healthful working conditions for workers by setting and enforcing standards and by providing training, outreach, education and assistance.
Explanation:
Answer:
d
Explanation:
i just took the test my gee
